Thursday, March 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 22

Dead Israeli baby photos promoted as ad on Twitter

0

An image that Israel says is of a baby killed during the Hamas attacks is being promoted onto people’s social media feeds as a paid-for advertisement.

The post, seen by Newsweek, is from the State of Israel’s official account on X, formerly Twitter, which has more than 1.3 million followers. The account is managed by the Israeli Foreign Ministry, it says.

The image, which Newsweek has not been able to verify, purportedly shows an infant victim of the incursion by Hamas, the militant group that has been designated a terrorist organization by the U.S.

Hamas led the deadliest Palestinian militant attack on Israel in history on October 7. Israel declared it was at war with Hamas and launched its heaviest-ever airstrikes on Gaza. As of Friday, at least 1,300 people in Israel had been killed, according to the Associated Press, citing the Israeli military. At least 1,500 people were killed in Gaza, the AP reported, citing authorities there.

The description accompanying the photo, which appeared on users’ X feeds from the Israel account, states: “This is the most difficult image we’ve ever posted. As we are writing this we are shaking. We went back and forth about posting this, but we need each and every one of you to know. This happened.”

The photo, which readers may find upsetting, shows an image of a baby lying in blood in what appears to be a hospital setting, with its face blurred.

The word “Ad” appears in the top right-hand corner of the post, suggesting that it was paid for by the Israel account to appear in social media users’ timelines, though Newsweek has not been able to confirm this. Newsweek has contacted X and the Israeli government for comment via email. This article will be updated if either responds.

A number of X users expressed their outrage after seeing the image appear in their feeds.

Arnesa Buljusmic-Kustura, an author and genocide researcher, wrote: “It’s utterly weird that Israel is literally running ads with horrific photos of babies all throughout twitter and other media too. That’s not a thing any other govt has ever done…Nobody else think it’s weird?”

Ben Smoke, a commissioning editor at Huck magazine, wrote: “State of Israel’s Twitter account put out a sponsored ad with the image of a murdered baby in it as it prepares to reduce Gaza, + hundreds of thousands of babies and children within it, to dust. Utilising [an] image of a dead child to manufacture consent to murder more is horrific.”

X user Iain Alexander wrote: “It is certainly ~striking~ for a few reasons that I have just been served—uncensored, save for the original blurring of the face—the official Israel state account’s tweet sharing the photo of a murdered baby, as an ad, in the middle of replies to an entirely unrelated tweet.”

However, other users said that it was important for social media users to see the image, and that promoting it as an advertisement would be one way to do so. They said that it would also address what they described as “conspiracy theories” around the events of October 7.

The image of the baby’s body was also shared by the State of Israel account in a regular post on October 12. The image appeared alongside two other photos showing what it claimed were bodies of babies who had been burned beyond recognition in Hamas attacks.

“Those who deny these events are supporting the barbaric animals who are responsible for them,” the post said. “Babies. Toddlers. Infants.”

According to X’s “Twitter Ads” section of its website, promoted posts are added to the timelines of those seen as a relevant audience.

“When you use Twitter to follow, Tweet, search, view, or interact with Tweets or Twitter accounts, we may use these actions to customize Twitter Ads for you,” the page reads. “For example, if you search for a specific term, we may show you promoted content related to that topic.”

The advertisement appeared as unconfirmed reports that Hamas militants beheaded around 40 Israeli babies amid the violence spread across the world.

On Wednesday, the White House backtracked on remarks made by President Joe Biden, who had said, “I never really thought that I would see and have confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children,” in remarks to Jewish community leaders.

A White House spokesperson later told The Washington Post and other news outlets that Biden and U.S. officials had not seen pictures of beheaded children, but that he was merely referencing the claims made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel Defense Force spokesperson Major Doron Spielman said he had not been able to verify that Hamas militants had beheaded the children.

“That specific report and that number I can’t confirm,” he told NBC News.

Donald Trump warns of Iran’s next "big move"

0

Donald Trump has warned that Iran is waiting to make a “big” move due to the policies of President Joe Biden.

The former president said in an all-caps post to Truth Social on Friday that the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict would never have happened if not for the “rigged and stollen [sic]” presidential election of 2020, repeating the unsubstantiated claim that his defeat to Biden was caused by massive voter fraud.

The October 7 surprise attack by Iran-backed Islamist group Hamas was the deadliest Palestinian militant assault on Israel in history. Israel subsequently launched its heaviest airstrikes on Gaza in history. As of Friday, at least 1,500 people had been killed in Israel, the Associated Press reported, with roughly 1,800 people killed in Gaza.

Trump wrote: “THE ATTACK ON ISRAEL WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED, ZERO CHANCE, IF THE ELECTION OF 2020 WAS NOT RIGGED AND STOLLEN. IT SHOWS THE WORLD HOW IMPORTANT ELECTIONS ARE.

“IRAN WAS BROKE AND TALKING, NOW THEY ARE RICH AND WATCHING, WAITING TO MAKE THEIR MOVE, AND IT WILL BE A BIG ONE! HOW COULD CROOKED JOE BIDEN, THE WORST AND MOST INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN?”

Trump went on to accuse the Biden administration of being responsible for “unprecedented death and destruction,” arguing that the region had been at peace due to his own administration’s role in brokering the Abraham Accords.

Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Friday.

The Abraham Accords, agreements intended to normalize Israeli-Arab relations, were signed between Israel, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates in September 2021. Israel signed additional agreements with Morocco and Sudan during the final months of the Trump administration.

The agreements have faced criticism for failing to ease Israeli-Palestinian tensions prior to the current conflict. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who helped in brokering the agreements, has also been under heavy fire over allegations that he used his role in Middle East diplomacy for personal financial gain.

Trump and other Republicans have criticized the Biden administration over a prisoner exchange deal that involved the release of $6 billion in frozen funds to Qatar, where it could be accessed by Iran for U.S.-monitored humanitarian purposes.

While some had claimed that the money was used by Iran to fund the attacks on Israel, White House officials said on Friday that Iran had not actually accessed any of the funds, with all of the money remaining in a Qatari bank account.

The U.S. and Qatari governments have also reportedly agreed to indefinitely block Iran from accessing the money amid the continuing conflict in Israel.

Iran has denied involvement in the attack on Israel, although Hamas representative Ahmed Abdulhadi told Newsweek earlier this week that the militant group had coordinated with Iran and Hezbollah—a Lebanese Islamist militant group backed by Iran—before and “during and after this battle at the highest level.”

Trump has faced backlash this week for seemingly praising Hezbollah after it launched a rocket attack on Israel, saying during a speech in Florida on Wednesday night that the group was “very smart” for launching the assault.

Israeli Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi accused Trump of spreading anti-Israel “propaganda” and “nonsense” with the remark and his recent criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggesting that the ex-president “obviously” cannot be relied on as an ally.

DeSantis tangles with voter on Israeli response to Hamas

0

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis had a heated campaign encounter with a voter who suggested that he supports the “annihilation” of Palestinians.

DeSantis was confronted by a man who said that the governor’s stance on the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict had cost him a 2024 GOP presidential primary vote during a campaign stop in Littleton, New Hampshire, on Thursday. A clip of the encounter was shared to X, formerly Twitter, by CBS reporter Aaron Navarro.

The October 7 surprise attack by Gaza-based Islamist militant group Hamas was the deadliest Palestinian militant assault on Israel in history. Israel subsequently launched its heaviest and deadliest airstrikes ever on Gaza.

As of Friday, at least 1,300 people had been killed in Israel, the Associated Press (AP) reported, citing the Israeli government. Over 1,800 people had been killed in Gaza, according to authorities there, AP said.

“Ron, what do you think about the annihilation and decapitation of all the Palestinians in Gaza right now?” the man in New Hampshire asked DeSantis. “They’ve basically bulldozed the whole … I worked in the Gaza Strip and worked in Palestinian refugee camps.”

“But they are not decapitating baby’s heads!” DeSantis replied. “They are not intentionally doing that.”

The man then said that Israel was “blowing up entire residential buildings,” citing videos that he said were broadcast by Al Jazeera, which is owned by the Qatari government.

DeSantis responded that he would “be very careful” with that outlet, as it is “funded by a lot of these Middle East countries.”

The man said that he did not “think they are faking pictures of families carrying their babies in, totally dead,” prompting another person in the crowd to claim “they fake pictures like that all the time.”

“Israel has been killing Palestinians for the whole time that Gaza has existed,” the man continued.

DeSantis responded by asserting that Hamas was intentionally getting civilians killed by using them as “human shields,” saying that Israel had warned Gaza residents to evacuate areas it was planning to attack.

“Israel put in a warning,” said DeSantis. “Hamas tells them not to leave. Hamas wants them to be human shields. That’s their tactic, technique and procedure.”

“How many other armed forces give warnings to get out before they go?” he added. “I think Israel’s probably the only one in the world that does that.”

The man went on to say that he did not “condone the killing of any innocent civilians or what Hamas did in the kibbutzes, but Israel is doing the exact same thing with [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu, who is a radical right-wing crazy person.”

“I see hundreds of Palestinian families that are dead and they have nowhere to go because they can’t leave Gaza,” the man said. “Because no one’s opening their borders.”

“You bring up a really good point: Why aren’t these Arab countries willing to absorb some of the Palestinian Arabs?” replied DeSantis. “They will not do it.”

The exchanged ended with the man telling the governor, “You had my vote, but you don’t now!”

Newsweek reached out for comment to the DeSantis campaign via online press contact form on Friday.

DeSantis’ remark on “decapitating baby’s heads” was an apparent reference to a claim from earlier this week that Hamas beheaded 40 babies during the initial attack.

The claim may have originated from reporter Nicole Zedek of the Tel Aviv news channel i24, who said on Tuesday that she was told of the alleged beheadings by an Israeli “commander” surveying the aftermath of Hamas attacking a kibbutz near the Gaza border.

While the claim spread rapidly online and sparked mass outrage, it is not clear whether the infant beheadings occurred.

The Israeli Defense Forces told Sky News on Wednesday that it could not confirm the claim, saying only that “a massacre” occurred at the kibbutz “in which women, children and toddlers and elderly were brutally butchered.”

China’s narrative places blame of Israel conflict on U.S. and West: ISW

0

The Chinese government is attempting to frame the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in a way that faults the U.S. and its Western allies, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

Gaza-based Islamist militant group Hamas last Saturday launched a surprise attack that was the deadliest Palestinian militant assault on Israel in history. Israel subsequently launched its heaviest and deadliest airstrikes ever on Gaza.

As of Friday, at least 1,300 people had been killed in Israel, the Associated Press (AP) reported, citing the Israeli government. Over 1,800 had been killed in Gaza, according to authorities there, AP said.

China has faced criticism for refusing to condemn Hamas. The U.S. and most of its Western allies have strongly denounced the militant group while firmly supporting the Israeli government.

A report released on Friday by ISW, a U.S-based think tank, says that China has accused the U.S. and its European allies of offering “biased” support for Israel, calling it an attempt to “delegitimize the United States as a responsible regional actor.”

An article published Wednesday in the Global Times, an English-language publication controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), argues that “one-sided support for Israel” by the U.S. is “unjust and unreasonable to Palestine.”

“This narrative places the blame for the current instability in the Middle East on the West,” the ISW report says. “This aligns with the CCP’s messaging during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine which blamed the United States and NATO expansion for instigating the crisis.”

ISW went on to criticize the Chinese government for pushing “a two-state solution amid the war,” arguing that the CCP was “portraying itself as an ostensible neutral broker” and that there were “similarities in CCP-propagated narratives between Ukraine and Israel.”

In response to a request for comment, the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Washington, D.C., pointed Newsweek to a Friday press conference by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin.

Wang argued that “China has always been on the side of equity and justice” in response to a question on the U.S. being “disappointed” in China’s remarks on the conflict in Israel.

“We oppose acts that harm civilians and violate international law,” said Wang. “We are committed to promoting peace talks and achieving a ceasefire and will continue to work for deescalation and resumption of peace talks.”

“In viewing and handling our relations with the U.S., we have always observed the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation proposed by President Xi Jinping,” he added.

As the Palestinian and Israeli death tolls mount, President Joe Biden‘s government and many of its Western allies have been unequivocal in offering support for Israel and condemnation for Hamas, Hezbollah and the other Islamist militant groups fighting the Middle Eastern country.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said that there were “not two sides” to the conflict during a press conference earlier this week, while condemning what she said were “repugnant” suggestions that the U.S. should not fund Israel’s war effort by members of the group of progressive lawmakers known as “The Squad,” such as Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.

Some Squad members have suggested that Israel is poised to violate international law and commit a war crime in retaliation for the Hamas attack. Representative Cori Bush expressed concerns in a Friday post to X, formerly Twitter, over Israel’s order for 1.1 million Palestinians to evacuate northern Gaza within 24 hours, calling it an “impossible task.”

Threat against Palestinians in America’s largest Muslim city spurs arrest

0

Police in Dearborn, Michigan, arrested one individual Thursday in connection to an online threat made toward Palestinian Americans in the Detroit suburb.

According to a statement by Dearborn Chief of Police Issa Shahin, police were made aware of the threat, which was posted to social media, after receiving a copy of the post through an anonymous tip on Wednesday. After a “thorough investigation,” the individual was arrested at their residence in Farmington Hills Thursday afternoon on probable cause of using a computer or electronic device to commit a crime, Shahin said.

Law enforcement agencies across the country have stepped up measures over concerns of potential security threats in light of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In Dearborn, which is home to the largest Muslim population per capita in the U.S., Shahin said that police have increased their presence at all places of worship and schools in the city.

“At this time, we are not aware of any additional credible threats. However, we remain in close, constant contact with our law enforcement partners at the federal, state, and local level, and continue to monitor,” Shahin said.

Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud, the city’s first Muslim mayor who was elected in 2022, said in a statement Thursday that he was “grateful” for the police department’s swift response and celebrated the city’s cultural diversity.

“For over a century, Metro Detroit has been home to a strong interfaith tapestry formed by decades of fellowship among neighbors of Jewish, Islamic, Christian, and other faiths,” Hammoud said. “We will not allow the disheartening actions of one individual to break the bonds of our longstanding relationships with one another.”

The nature of the online threat or the identity of the individual arrested on Thursday were not immediately known. Shahin said the individual is in custody while police continue their investigation.

Newsweek reached out to the Dearborn Police Department via email for further information.

Police departments in some of America’s largest cities responded to fears of potential violence or safety threats ahead of Friday in anticipation of what some have deemed a “Day of Jihad” after the former Hamas leader called for widespread protests in support of Palestinians. White House Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby told reporters Thursday that the federal government was “absolutely” focused on “any threats to the American people.”

U.S. Capitol Police said in a statement to Fox 11 that they were “enhancing security throughout the Capitol Complex” in preparation for expected protests on Friday. The police departments in New York City and Los Angeles also announced on Thursday that they were increasing security measures, but neither department has detected any credible threats to their respective cities.

Liz Cheney’s prediction for Republicans if Jim Jordan becomes speaker

0

Former GOP Representative Liz Cheney warned Republicans that nominating Congressman Jim Jordan for the House speakership could cost them the majority in the lower chamber.

In a post to X, formerly Twitter, on Friday, Cheney condemned Jordan’s close allyship to former President Donald Trump and his alleged involvement in efforts to keep Trump in power after losing the 2020 election. The Ohio lawmaker was previously found by the January 6 House committee to be a “significant player,” but is not facing any criminal charges.

“Jim Jordan was involved in Trump’s conspiracy to steal the election and seize power; he urged that Pence refuse to count lawful electoral votes,” wrote Cheney, who served as one of two Republicans on the January 6 select committee.

“If Rs nominate Jordan to be Speaker, they will be abandoning the Constitution,” she continued. “They’ll lose the House majority and they’ll deserve to.”

Cheney also gave an ominous warning to House Republicans last week after news broke of Jordan’s bid for the speakership, saying during a speech at the University of Minnesota, “If they were to decide that, there would no longer be any possible way to argue that a group of elected Republicans could be counted on to defend the Constitution.”

In the nine days since Congressman Kevin McCarthy was thrown out of the speaker’s chair, House Republicans have failed to put forward a nominee with enough support from the caucus to get the 217 votes required for election.

Jordan previously lost the speaker nomination to Representative Steve Scalise in a 113 to 99 vote earlier this week. But with Scalise withdrawing his name from the race late Thursday, and Georgia Representative Austin Scott filing to run for the speakership on Friday, Jordan and his supporters remain steadfast in seeing the House Judiciary Committee chairman receive the nomination.

Some Republicans have spoken out against Jordan’s run for speaker, although the Ohio lawmaker has earned the support of Trump and McCarthy. The ex-speaker told NBC News Friday, “Everybody’s got a right to run but I think Jim’s better prepared in the process to be speaker.”

Colorado Representative Ken Buck told HuffPost that he voted “present” during an internal GOP meeting Wednesday when party members were choosing between Scalise and Jordan, adding that neither one would clearly say if the 2020 election was legitimate.

On January 5, 2021, Scott signed a letter alongside 12 House Republicans, stating that Congress should not object to the Electoral College results and that the 2020 election was legitimate, reported NBC News.

Newsweek reached out to Jordan’s office via email for comment on Friday.

Mohammed Deif, Che Guevara to Gaza, Bin Laden to Israel, faces last stand

0

As the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) step up their assault on the Gaza Strip in the wake of the deadliest-ever Palestinian militant assault on Israel, the murky figure at the heart of Hamas’ military wing may be getting ready to make his final stand.

Little is known for certain about Mohammed Deif. That’s by design for Hamas’ Al-Qassam Military Brigades supreme commander, whose nom de guerre means “guest” in an apparent reference to his frequently shifting location. Deif’s elusiveness has allowed him to escape numerous Israeli attempts on his life. But having survived so long, a massive IDF incursion could bring a dramatic end to a bloody game of cat-and-mouse that’s dragged on for more than three decades.

“I don’t think that a man with his legacy, name and position, and immersed in the culture of steadfastness and martyrdom thinks of leaving his land and battlefield,” Khaled Hroub, professor at Northwestern University in Qatar who has authored books on Hamas’ inner workings, tells Newsweek.

“If a ground campaign takes place, and the Israelis managed to get to him, he will fight until the last drop of blood,” Hroub adds.

Hamas is fighting to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamist Palestinian state and Deif’s role has been pivotal, not least in masterminding the assault by land, air and sea on October 7 that left at least 1,300 dead in Israel, followed by crushing Israeli airstrikes on Gaza in which casualties are nearing 2,000.

Deif has already suffered various injuries in assassination attempts: reportedly losing an eye, part of his arm and his legs. He also lost his wife, 7-month-old son and 3-year-old daughter in an airstrike during the last total war in Gaza in 2014. New reports suggest the ongoing IDF campaign has now killed more relatives, including his brother and son, possibly indicating an intensified Israeli campaign to take him out once and for all.

But while Hroub said Deif’s downfall may have short-term impacts on Hamas’ military capabilities, he argued that achieving martyrdom status for a man so widely revered by his supporters—and reviled by detractors—could at the same time actually enhance Hamas’ status and prestige.

“Deif could become a Palestinian Che Guevara,” he said.

Chasing a Myth

Such an image presents a unique challenge to Israel. What sets Deif apart from other senior Hamas leaders, such as Gaza chief Yahya Sinwar and political head Ismail Haniyeh, according to Yossi Kuperwasser, former head of the IDF Intelligence Corps’ Research Division and director general of Ministry of Strategic Affairs, “is that he is a symbol more than anybody else.”

Kupperwaser compares Deif to Iran’s Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, Hezbollah military chief Imad Mughniyeh and 9/11 architect Khalid Sheikh Mohammed of Al-Qaeda, telling Newsweek that, “even though we don’t try to make him as such, he has become a myth.” To many Israelis, he’s their Osama bin Laden, the most readily identifiable face of 9/11.

While Soleimani was killed in a 2020 U.S. airstrike, bin Laden died during a 2011 U.S. raid, Mughniyeh was slain in a 2008 joint CIA-Mossad operation and Mohammed was captured in a joint U.S.-Pakistani sting in 2003, Deif remains on the run as Israel’s most wanted man.

Avi Melamed, former Israeli intelligence official and senior adviser on Arab affairs, tells Newsweek it is currently in the IDF’s interest not to focus on the hunt for Deif, potentially further feeding into his reputation as a “man of shadow” who still may ultimately get away.

“Israel’s strategic objective is currently to destroy Hamas’ military and organizational capacities. This is the move,” Melamed says. “One person is not the story. We may get to them, we may never get to them, they may be buried somewhere that we’ll never know about, it’s irrelevant to a large extent.”

“You don’t need to further blow up the myth,” Melamed adds. “He’s a brutal murderer, he is a very dangerous and sophisticated person, bordering psychotic personality.”

For a number of Hamas supporters, however, Deif’s enigmatic capacity to wage war from the shadows has long helped fuel support for his cause. As Mkhaimar Abusada, chairman of the department of political science at Al-Azhar University in Gaza, tells Newsweek, “his presence is important to the military wing of Hamas, they admire him and are very inspired by his leadership.”

Ayman al-Rafati, a researcher who serves on the board of directors at the Center for Regional Studies in Gaza, tells Newsweek that Deif “has become a symbol of the Palestinian resistance and has great popularity among Palestinians.” Today, Deif “is considered an inspiration to the new generation of Palestinians everywhere in Palestine, as evidenced by the chants that always ring his name.”

The Man Behind the Shadow

Only two known photos reveal Deif’s face, both taken decades ago. So when a silhouetted Deif made a rare appearance in a recorded speech released in the opening hours of Hamas’ unprecedented attack, Palestinian fighters were all the more galvanized. Deif now also sought to rally fighters beyond, calling upon “brothers in the Islamic resistance in Lebanon, Iran, Yemen, Iraq and Syria” to join in against Israel, a call that’s actively being discussed in all five countries.

Behind the literal shadow, Deif’s true identity is Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri, also referred to Abu Khaled, born around 1965 in the southern Gaza refugee camp of Khan Younis, according to Melamed. Like many Palestinians, he hails from a family deeply impacted by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, originating in the village of Al-Qubayba, from which Palestinians fled in the 1948 war at Israel’s founding that set the stage for many more decades of strife in the Middle East, before relocating to Khan Younis, long on the front lines of the conflict.

Deif pursued his studies at the Islamic University of Gaza and even joined a theater group, Melamed said, giving him a flair for the dramatic still palpable in his charged speeches. He became involved with Hamas sometime after the group’s inception as a manifestation of Muslim Brotherhood resistance to Israel in the 1980s and ended up spending 16 months in an Israeli prison, the only known setback in an otherwise unbroken record of eluding capture.

He went on to become an innovative member of the newly formed Al-Qassam Brigades, particularly excelling in strategy and bomb-making. He has been linked by Israeli authorities to high-profile operations including the killings of IDF soldiers and a deadly suicide bombing campaign in the 1990s before eventually taking the helm of the force in 2002 during the Second Intifada, or uprising, following the death of Salah Shehadeh in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza.

The Will to Live

Melamed said that, for someone so sworn to a cause that glorifies martyrdom, Deif has proven exceptionally committed to staying alive.

“In most of the cases, these people are not exactly the typical figure you think about who are willing to die at all costs, that they don’t care, and so forth,” Melamed said. “At the end of the day, you find out those people, whether it’s ISIS people or Islamic Jihad people or Hamas people, they are often taking a lot of precautions for one reason, to defend themselves, to avoid damage to themselves.”

“They know to protect themselves quite well,” Melamed adds.

Kuperwasser says Deif is likely considering both fight or flight options, though he believes Deif “would rather escape to survive and keep fighting from another place.” He’s a “good learner,” Kuperwasser says. “Every time we managed to reach him, he did the necessary learning process to make sure that it would be difficult for us to catch him again. He was never complacent.”

In fact, Deif “has a very high sense and measures for security,” Rafati says. “No one knows Deif’s fate or his location in Gaza. The lack of physical photos of him complicates the chances of identifying him or reaching him if we assume that Israel is able to completely invade Gaza by land this time.”

No Way Out

Should such an operation occur, however, Rafati says Palestinians fully expect Deif to meet his end in battle. “A person who has led the struggle for more than 35 years cannot be expected to escape from the battle, which is his project for which he lived, and people like him are ready to die in order to achieve their major and strategic goals of ‘the liberation of Palestine’ and establishing a Palestinian state.”

Echoing Hroub, Rafati says Deif’s death “may sadden the Palestinians, but it will not stop the resistance to the occupation.” Abusada agrees, saying, “his killing will not put an end to Hamas. Hamas is an idea, an ideology and they cannot finish and kill this idea.”

But whether or not Deif is anticipating a fiery finale, the magnitude of the Israeli military operation may not give him that choice.

“If there is going to be a ground invasion against Gaza, I do not think he will try to flee, and even if he tries to flee, the only path is through Egypt, that is not easy,” Abusada says. “He most likely will fight the Israeli army until his death.”

Vivek Ramaswamy outlines "real danger of AI" in conversation with voters

0

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy addressed what he considers to be the “real” dangers posed by artificial intelligence (AI) during a recent conversation with voters in Iowa.

Ramaswamy was participating in a “Coffee with the Candidates” discussion hosted by the Des Moines-based television news station KCCI when a voter asked Ramaswamy about his views on AI, including how he believes it should be developed and used.

ChatGPT has become one of the most popular AI tools available to the public since its launch in November 2022. An estimated 180.5 million people around the world were using ChatGPT in August, according to Reuters. Users communicate with the chatbot by sending it questions or prompts, to which it quickly sends responses. OpenAI recently released updates that enable users to send visual and audio prompts, which people have been using for a variety of tasks ranging from creating computer code to identifying films based on uploaded screenshots.

Ramaswamy, who, at 38, is the GOP’s youngest presidential candidate, began his response by saying AI is a topic for which he believes “a leader from the next generation” will be “necessary in the next president.”

As AI development continues, Ramaswamy said technology companies developing AI tools will need to act responsibly. “Just like you can’t dump your chemicals, if you’re a chemical company, in somebody else’s river, well if you’re developing an AI algorithm today that has a negative impact on other people, you bear the liability for it,” he said.

To illustrate what he identified as the “real danger” of AI, Ramaswamy used an example involving ChatGPT, the chatbot designed by the AI company OpenAI. “You go to ChatGPT, just try typing it in: How do you fight climate change, or racial injustice? It gives you a factual answer, as though it was converting Fahrenheit to Celsius,” he said. “That’s the real danger of AI, is that people bend the knee to a new master.”

Despite the potential benefits of ChatGPT and other AI tools, many tech leaders are warning about the risks AI poses if its development gets out of hand. Members of the public aren’t sure they can trust AI, either. In the U.S., a majority of Americans have said they are “more concerned than excited” about the uptick in AI use, according to Pew Research Center survey results released in August.

Ramaswamy told Iowa voters he has prior experience with AI. He said he used AI while working at a drug development company he founded.

“I think AI can have a lot of good uses in this country. But there are also real risks,” he said. “The real risk is when it comes to interfacing with people.”

The entrepreneur joined the GOP presidential field earlier this year by embracing his role as a self-described “political outsider.” He received a boost in the polls after he participated in the first GOP presidential debate in August, during which he engaged in several verbal battles with the other candidates.

National polling averages compiled by FiveThirtyEight and last updated on Friday showed Ramaswamy in third place at 7.2 percent, polling less than 6 percent behind Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Former President Donald Trump remains the race’s frontrunner with polling averages more than 40 points higher than all other candidates.

Newsweek reached out to Ramaswamy’s campaign by email on Friday for comment.

It took me 30 years to achieve my childhood dream

0

When I was eight years old there were two things I wanted to do: Join the Navy and write books. Being a sailor, in its way, was easier than finishing a book, so much so that even now I remember what it felt like to complete my first novel.

It was 1994, I was 31 and had already made three or four attempts at it. When I finally completed one, it was nothing short of miraculous. King of Peru, the story of a schizophrenic marine trying to navigate life in college, took me more than a year to write, and when it was done I knew it was perfect, that every word was inspired.

My hubris would allow me to believe nothing less, despite having completed very little editing. Almost none. Why would I want or need to edit inspiration? Wouldn’t that be an affront to the universe?

The hard lessons were learned when the rejection letters started rolling in. Agents and publishers couldn’t reject King of Peru fast enough.

Since, in 1994, correspondence and manuscripts were sent via regular mail, on actual paper, within six months I’d received a sufficient number of rejections to paper a small bathroom which, after careful consideration, I declined to do.

Who wants to be confronted by failure every time one sits down to do their business?

But I did keep a rejection folder in the filing cabinet, and would occasionally review its contents. This activity was mostly reserved for late nights when I was feeling particularly sorry for myself.

Willing myself to—mostly—ignore the solid stream of turndowns, I continued to plug away on the publishing front and even completed another novel, Bogeyman, about an insecure loser falsely accused of murder.

But the peddling of Bogeyman forced me to create an additional rejection folder and, being a glutton for punishment, I continued my efforts to find a home for both novels simultaneously.

These efforts yielded only more rejection, and Bogeyman would be my last serious attempt at novel writing for the next fifteen years, though this was not a result of being spurned by the entire literary industry.

Then why abandon the dream?

I blame my children. I blame a dream I didn’t even know I had.

You see, my oldest was born after I’d finished King of Peru and, by the time of her arrival, I’d nearly completed Bogeyman as well.

All was right with the world. I had a healthy daughter, a wife who loved me and supported my writing habit, and two completed novels that I was sure, with all my heart, would one day take the world by storm. But, to paraphrase Robert Burns, the best-laid plans of mice and men often go astray.

Fatherhood got the better of me—and it was glorious.

Everything changed the moment she was born. Suddenly nothing else mattered. Now my purpose in life was to arrange my world in such a way that this child would have every opportunity to grow up healthy and strong.

This baby, I was sure, would change our world, but I had to change mine first. In short order I landed a full-time job, abandoning the table-waiting and student teaching, and traded the dangerous sports car for a safe, used minivan.

Two and half years later my son was born. Two and half years after that, another daughter.

Everything seemed to be working out. Sure, I hadn’t written anything for years. Sure, my wife noticed my lack of literary production. One Christmas, she even attempted to encourage my writing habit with the gift of blank notebooks. But I was too far gone.

Though the desire to write never really left me, as a father of three, distractions were ample, and I indulged in them because it was easier, and the results more immediate, than spending another year writing a book I believed no one would ever read.

The only constant, however, is change. Fifteen years later, the cracks in my marriage had grown too wide to paper over. I could no longer hide from them, the way I’d hidden away the rejection letters.

But nothing is perfectly good or perfectly bad, and it was the failure of a 20-year marriage, the damage and pain it brought to everyone involved, that forced me back to my desk.

I started writing again. It was a way to offload some of the overwhelming sadness that accompanied the destruction of my family. And Burning Buildings, the story of an unchained, depressed banker, was born.

Though it took nearly three years to write, the first chapters came quickly. I was astonished, even alarmed, at the speed with which the words arrived, especially after having written nothing in 15 years.

So, fearing hubris would again get the better of me, I put together a crack team of beta readers, paid them with beer, and actually used their observations to help me edit the book.

With age comes wisdom—hopefully.

And six years ago, Burning Buildings found Nancy the agent who, despite her initial reservations about it being written in first-person, believed in me and the book.

Signing with Nancy after two years of searching brought a rush of endorphins. I rode the high all that day and for weeks after. With an agent, I was absolutely sure my book would find a publisher.

But, sadly, I had yet to discover the literary recipe for success. Six months and around 26 rejections later and I was ready to paper another bathroom. It was time for a come-to-Jesus with Nancy. I dialed and she picked right up.

“What do I do?”

“Self-publish Burning Buildings and write another one.”

Her response seemed so straightforward, so elegant in its simplicity. If at first you don’t succeed, and all that. And, really, what choice did I have? Wallow in self-pity and never write again? I did as I was told.

Sisyphus had it easy. Pushing boulders seems effortless compared to pushing books.

Undaunted, or at least only semi-daunted, I got the idea for my next book while hiking Pikes Peak with a group of friends. One of the hikers, who happened to be an astrophysicist, used precious, thinning air to tell me the tale of a Friday night she’d decided, as an experiment, to “tie one on” and write about it.

She bought a notebook and kept a record of everything she thought and felt after each drink, and told me she made it through eight or nine drinks before she could no longer write legibly.

A bit of a drinker myself, I loved the premise and asked her if I could use the idea for a book. She agreed and, two and half years later, my next book was complete.I phoned Nancy.

“What’s it called?”

“Drunk Log.”

“What’s it about?”

“A suicidal guy that’s gonna get drunk and write about it before he throws himself off a bridge.”

I sensed hesitation on the other end of the phone.

“Drunk Log? Hmmm… Fine. I’ll give it a read.”

Nancy didn’t fire me and, hope against fading hope, found a publisher for the book. But there was one caveat: I had to turn it into a series. A series, I was told, would give my audience a chance to build and become familiar with my work.

Series? If it will get me published, hell yes. Shave my head? Same. After decades of effort and delayed gratification, I was ready to do just about anything to realize a dream I’d had since I was eight.

So a series it was, even though it forced me to let the main character live, perhaps not a bad thing, as some readers expressed dismay at the possibility I might kill him.

At this point, the book has had very little financial impact on me. Although I believe sales are growing over time, I’ve spent more money promoting the books than I have made in royalties.

Judging by my ranking on Amazon, I would say sales aren’t bad. Book writing and selling is a crowded field. Even selling four or five hundred books is no mean feat. I believe, however, that as I continue to publish, sales across my catalog will grow as readers learn to trust me.

Publishing my book has had an overall positive impact on my life, though at times I don’t properly balance the book work with my day job.

I currently have three books available for purchase. The first was self-published while Drunk Log and First Date are with a traditional publisher. Free Will, the final book of the series will be out in the next few months.

So while a child’s dream, nursed for decades, was finally realized, for posterity and for my own edification, I still keep a rejection folder as a reminder. I figure I’ll need it as long as I keep writing, and that’s a good thing.

Mark E. Scott is an author from Ohio. His novel First Date is available now.

All views expressed in this article are the author’s own.

Do you have a unique experience or personal story to share? Email the My Turn team at myturn@newsweek.com.

Fact Check: Did Hamas backers climb Israeli border wall for "Day of Jihad"?

0

Former Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal has called for protests around the world this week, encouraging the application of jihad—a word that has been widely used by the group and other Islamist militants in the context of holy war.

Mashaal released a video statement to Reuters calling on others to “Deliver a message through, the squares and the streets, a message of anger, that we are with Palestine.”

Following his statement, a video appeared online suggesting it had provoked Lebanese Hamas supporters to scale Israel’s border wall “in answers to calls for a Global Day of Jihad.”

On October 7, Hamas led the deadliest Palestinian militant attack on Israel in history. Israel subsequently launched its heaviest ever airstrikes on Gaza. As of Friday, more than 1,300 people had been killed in Israel, the Associated Press reported. At least 1,799 people had been killed in Gaza, according to authorities there, the AP said, citing the Gaza Health Ministry.

As Israel appeared to be preparing for a ground offensive, roughly 1.1 million people in northern Gaza were ordered to evacuate as the Israel-Hamas fighting entered its seventh day Friday. Hamas urged residents to stay put.

The Claim

A post on X, formerly Twitter, by self-described “content curator/creator” Wide Awake Media, posted on October 13, 2023, and viewed 183,000 times, included a video of people climbing what looked like a border wall. Others in the crowd could be seen carrying flags, including a Palestinian flag.

The tweet read: “Lebanese Hamas supporters are reportedly climbing Israel’s border wall, in answer to calls for a ‘Global Day of Jihad’ by former Hamas leader, Khalid Mashal [sic].”

The Facts

The video has nothing to do with the recent conflict in Israel nor the comments made by Mashaal this week.

The footage was recorded during a protest at a border wall between Lebanon and Israel on May 15, 2021, when supporters gathered near the Lebanese border of village of Odaisseh as part of a series of global protests triggered by conflict in Gaza, according to Al-Jazeera.

Some of those who had gathered began climbing the border wall, as footage recorded by CNN shows. The video shared on X, claiming to be of “Lebanese Hamas supporters,” was posted on the platform on May 16, 2021.

In the clip on X, in the middle of the group on the wall, is one protester wearing a dark jacket, white shirt, a white and blue scarf, cream trousers and white sneakers.

The same person can be seen in photos shot by Reuters and in the CNN report at about 1:17—the protester appears at the bottom of the crowd “attempting to scale the 25-foot tall concrete walls.”

The protest was eventually broken up by Lebanese forces.

There has been a steady stream of misinformation shared online since Hamas’ attack on Israel. Video game recordings have been misleadingly repurposed and falsely attributed as combat footage, while politicians and others have suggested Hamas has a presence south of the U.S. border.

The Ruling

False.

The clip shared on Twitter is not of “Lebanese Hamas supporters” responding to calls this week for a “global jihad.”

The video was recorded during a protest in 2021 at the border between Lebanon and Israel. Multiple media outlets covered the event. Cross-referencing the clip on X with news footage of the protest shows they were recorded at the same time.

FACT CHECK BY Newsweek’s Fact Check team

False: The claim is demonstrably false. Primary source evidence proves the claim to be false. Read more about our ratings.