Friday, May 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 61

Russia blames US for Israel attacks: "Idiots"

0

The biggest attack on Israel by Palestinian militants in years was caused by U.S. foreign policy failures, the former President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev has said, as Russian social-media users celebrated the outbreak of violence.

Medvedev is the deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, and served as head of state between 2008 and 2012. He linked the U.S. to the actions by those from the military wing of the Palestinian Islamic political party Hamas, who entered Israeli towns and fired rockets from the Gaza Strip it controls to the west of Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel is “at war” and vowed that Hamas will “pay a price it has never known”, amid reports that at least 20 people have been killed, the border fence has been breached and Israelis taken hostage. Newsweek has as yet not verified these figures.

Medvedev has regularly posted anti-Western and anti-U.S. invective, mostly regarding the West’s support for Kyiv in the war that Moscow started. However, on Saturday, he turned to the wider geopolitical issue of the U.S. role in the Middle East. Medvedev wrote on Telegram that the outbreak of clashes “is an event that could have been expected.”

“The conflict between Israel and Palestine has been going on for decades. And the U.S. is a key player there,” he wrote.

“Instead of actively working on a Palestinian-Israeli settlement, these idiots have crept into our country and are helping neo-Nazis with all their might, pitting two close peoples against each other,” Medvedev said.

This repeats Kremlin rhetoric that part of its justification of the war in Ukraine was to “denazify” its neighbor, a reason widely dismissed by the global community.

“What can stop America’s obsession with fomenting conflict around the world? Apparently, only civil war,” Medvedev added.

When contacted for comment, the U.S. State Department referred Newsweek to its statement, which said that it “unequivocally condemns the appalling attacks by Hamas terrorists against Israel, including civilians and civilian communities.”

“There is never any justification for terrorism. We stand in solidarity with the government and people of Israel,” the statement added.

Meanwhile, Russian bloggers on Telegram expressed support for the attacks in Israel. “Israelis flee to the military enlistment office,” posted the account of Rosich, which prompted smiley emojis from some of the account’s 190,000 followers.

Next to a clip of people fleeing, the Telegram account of Russki Tarantas said that there should be “not a drop of pity or sympathy” for Israelis. The channel Frontovic proclaimed how “Israel was on fire!”

State channel host Sergey Mardan wrote that the turmoil will be beneficial to Russia. He added that Iran, which backs Hamas “is our real military ally,” while Israel “is an ally of the United States,” so “choosing a ‘side’ is very simple.”

Geopolitical analyst Jessica Berlin wrote on X that Russia had steadily strengthened ties with Iran-backed Hamas over the past decade: “Make no mistake: what you’re seeing in Israel today is directly connected to what you see in Ukraine every day.”

Ukraine war maps show counteroffensive progress this week

0

Ukraine has said its forces have made incremental advances on the front line as maps from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank show the rate of Kyiv’s progress in its counteroffensive.

Over four months ago, Ukraine launched a counteroffensive with the aim of recapturing Russian-occupied territory, which Kyiv and its Western backers have said has been slower than anticipated.

The ISW noted on Friday that, the previous day, geolocated footage showed that Ukrainian troops had advanced towards a tree line in western Zaporizhzhia oblast, between Robotyne, which Ukraine captured in August, and Verbove, the settlement thought to be next in Kyiv’s sights.

One ISW map shows this advance toward Verbove and how, on October 4, Ukrainian troops had moved east of the settlement of Novoprokopivka.

The graphic also indicated how the situation in Zaporizhzhia had developed over the last few days. Geolocated footage showed how Kyiv’s troops had controlled the three trench systems south of Robotyne.

The ISW said that Ukrainian forces continued “successful” offensive actions near Andriivka, which is around 5 miles southeast of Bakhmut, the Donetsk city fiercely fought over for months. Another ISW map outlined how this fight continues, although it notes that Russian forces had advanced to the E-50 highway.

The U.S. independent think tank’s assessment comes as Illia Yevlash, spokesperson for the Eastern Grouping of Forces, said that his forces were preparing offensive operations throughout the autumn and winter period, even if rain and fog could complicate the use of drones and tactical and army aviation.

The ISW has previously said that the change in weather will not stop either side from conducting offensive operations throughout the winter if they were still well supplied. How Ukraine continues with its counteroffensive will also be determined by continued Western provisions of small arms and ammunition, the think tank added.

It comes amid a barrage of Russian shelling on Friday with a total of 51 explosions recorded throughout the day, the Sumy Oblast Military Administration reported on Telegram.

Overnight on Friday, Russian forces launched several Onyx supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles from Crimea targeting Odesa Oblast, Ukraine’s Southern Defense Forces reported on Telegram. The missiles hit a recreational facility and a grain storage unit in the port city with debris and a blast wave setting alight garages and damaging apartment blocks.

There was also a cluster bomb attack on in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, which killed a woman and wounded two people, regional governor Yuriy Malashko reported on Saturday.

It follows an international outcry at missile strikes at a village in the Kharkiv region on Thursday, which local officials said killed 52 people. Another missile strike the next day in the city of Kharkiv killed a 10-year-old and his grandmother, officials said.

What’s happening in Israel right now as it battles full-scale Hamas assault

0

Hours after Hamas suddenly launched a sweeping land, sea and air surprise attack on Israel, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are still battling with Palestinian fighters, with an unknown number of casualties believed to be mounting.

The sudden assault began early Saturday, a Jewish holiday, as Hamas fired thousands of rockets against Israel and reportedly sent fighters by land and sea into the country in a comprehensive operation it declared “Al-Aqsa Flood” after the revered holy site in disputed East Jerusalem.

As the IDF scrambled to respond to hostilities on multiple fronts, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared his country was “at war.” The IDF retaliation has been named “Sword of Iron” and includes airstrikes against Hamas and another Palestinian group, Islamic Jihad, in the Gaza Strip.

“We are fighting in 22 locations,” IDF spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari said in a briefing shared with Newsweek. “There is no community in Southern Israel where we do not have forces, in all the towns. There are communities that have been rid of terrorists, but we want to finish additional scans of the area before declaring so.”

Hagari said that, earlier, “dozens of terrorists infiltrated on foot” in “a large number of locations,” in addition to a naval landing at the southern Israel kibbutz of Zikim, and numerous security fence breaches.

Now, he stated, “there are hostage situations” and “live fire fights” in Ofakim and Beeri, where Israeli special forces and senior commanders are present.

Also, “there are deaths—including deaths of IDF soldiers,” Hagari added, “when we have all the numbers we will give them.”

The number of active fronts and locations of the hostage situations were also confirmed by IDF spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Richard Hecht. He also did not provide an exact number of casualties, but said the figure was “substantial.”

Responding to Newsweek‘s question, Hecht stated that Hamas was believed to still have a “massive” amount of rockets in store, so further strikes were expected, such as a more recent salvo that targeted Tel Aviv.

Israeli health officials have reported on the deaths of at least 250 Israelis since the fighting broke out, while health officials in Gaza recorded at least 232 deaths as a result of Israeli strikes.

In addition to the Israeli air response, Hagari said that the IDF has begun a “wide mobilization of reserves,” bringing four divisions to Gaza to join 31 regular battalions already active on the frontline with the Palestinian enclave and across southern Israel.

“We will do a very sharp and thorough review,” Hagari said. “We are currently busy regaining control of the area, striking broadly and especially taking care of the area around the Gaza Strip.”

“The citizens of the State of Israel are require great resilience, with an emphasis on the residents of the Gaza Strip,” he added. “These are difficult hours of fighting— but at the end we will reach full security in the Gaza Strip.”

Hagari also noted that the IDF is on “high alert” across its northern borders with Lebanon and Syria, with which Israel remains in a technical state of war. In previous flare-ups, rockets have been fired against Israel from these fronts and, in Lebanon, the powerful Hezbollah has expressed support for the Palestinian attack.

Hecht too said the IDF was “prepared for an escalation on the north.” He also pointed to the suspected involvement of Iran, which backs Hezbollah and is supportive of Hamas as well.

In a statement, Hezbollah said it was “in direct contact with the leadership of the Palestinian resistance at home and abroad and conducts with it a continuous assessment of events and the progress of operations.”

Reached for comment, a Hamas spokesperson shared with Newsweek the latest remarks by the group’s political chief, Ismail Haniyeh, who said the operation came in response to Israeli abuses against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and Jerusalem.

“We warned the whole world, with this fascist government that unleashed the settlers to wreak havoc in Al-Aqsa Mosque and in Jerusalem,” Haniyeh said. “And we told them not to play with fire, and not to cross the red line, but they deafened their ears and blinded their eyes.”

The ongoing conflict comes amid a sharp uptick in Israeli-Palestinian violence in the West Bank, where the IDF has stepped up raids against suspected militants. It also comes at a fluid moment for global geopolitics as a growing number of Arab countries pursue reconciliation with both Israel and its top foe, Iran, and a significant amount of attention is fixated on the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.

Haniyeh claimed these events gave Israeli leadership the notion that they could achieve a victory in the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“The occupation believed that the surrounding environment, the calmness of the Arab and Islamic peoples, and the world’s preoccupation with the Ukrainian-Russian war, meant that the time had come to resolve the battle of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa,” Haniyeh said, going on to cite the Quran.

“But as God Almighty said,” he added. “‘You did not think that they would emerge, and they thought that their fortresses would protect them from God.'”

Newsweek has reached out to Hezbollah and the Iranian Mission to the United Nations for comment, as well as to the IDF for further details.

New Gaza War on Israel Highlights a False ‘Conception’

0

TEL AVIV, Israel _ Israelis marked the 50th anniversary of the 1973 Yom Kippur war in recent weeks with much agonizing over the collapse of the ill-fated so-called “conception” that the Arabs would not dare attack, as Egypt and Syria did. Almost a half century to the day since that mistake comes the fall of an equally foolish idea: that Gaza can be blockaded and contained, cut off from Israel by a security fence while its people are hemmed in and left to be ruled by terrorist groups.

That conception shattered above my head on Saturday, Oct. 7, when I was awoken by rocket fire over central Tel Aviv, with the Iron Dome system zapping the incoming missiles out of the sky, leaving debris to rain down on nearby streets.

The Gaza conception featured two corollaries as well: that the West Bank Palestinians can be provoked with impunity by Israel’s reckless government, and that Saudi Arabia will eventually make peace with Israel without the Palestinian issue being addressed—leaving the Palestinians an irrelevant player in the Middle East equation.

It turned out that on the day of their choosing, hundreds of armed Hamas fighters simply cut through the fence between Gaza and Israel and were able to roam free in nearby communities, killing and kidnapping civilians and initially facing almost no military opposition. The shock in Israel is so great that there is a chance that this event will end the 16 years of strategic paralysis that began when Hamas threw the Palestinian Authority out of Gaza in 2007. And all of a sudden the Palestinians are relevant again.

At this writing, it looks like Israel has suffered more than 100 civilians killed, more than 1,000 wounded, and an unknown but considerable number abducted. The latter sets up a likely prolonged drama featuring threatened executions and negotiations for prisoner swaps, where Israel has a history of eventually paying a very high price.

It is a spectacular failure on multiple fronts: tactically, it’s clear there was no sufficient plan to defend the border towns and kibbutzim on the Israeli side of the border; intelligence-wise, it’s clear that Israel did not know—as hundreds of operatives inside Gaza must have—that the attack was coming. That will badly rattle the vaunted Shin Bet security service.

And strategically, the whole edifice of the policy toward Gaza has led to a genuine disaster.

Was it hastened by the poisonous political divisions in Israel? Is that why Hamas chose to attack? And was Israel’s apparent lack of preparedness somehow caused or exacerbated by the internal schism? These questions may not be answerable anytime soon, but what is clear is that Israel is currently led by a spectacularly incompetent far-right government, run by a criminal defendant to boot.

Tragically, barring the quick establishment of a national unity government, it is this motley crew that must now decide on the reaction. The challenge is this: The attacks have created a psychology of transformation, and a genuine sense that there can be no return to the status quo ante; but the actual options on the ground remain as unpalatable as they were before.

For Israel’s response to be truly different from its policy to date, it would mean occupying the Gaza Strip and removing Hamas from power—presumably to reinstall the Palestinian Authority. This would involve street-by-street fighting by Israeli soldiers against a force of tens of thousands that is armed to the teeth, led by gangsters and fanatics, who are absolutely ruthless about putting civilians in harm’s way. Israel can expect considerable losses on all sides that would probably dwarf what happened on Saturday. It also risks executions of the hostages held in Gaza.

Israel also has the option of repeating its previous strategy of bombardment of Gaza, this time demanding a return of the hostages as opposed to the end of rocket fire (though that too will surely come). That might include pinpoint assassinations of Hamas leaders—but again, the hostages are a complicating factor.

Any operation that lasts long risks expanding in three directions: Hezbollah could join in, firing rockets at Israel from Lebanon and dragging that country into the war; the Palestinians in the West Bank could start a new intifada; and there is a chance, in some ways Israel’s worst-case scenario, that extremists among Israel’s Arab citizens will join in as well, setting fire to Israel’s streets.

Any one of these scenarios could be a game-changer in Israeli politics, even though of course for the moment everyone will claim politics are not a factor.

On one hand, the attack is a chance for a much-needed reboot for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose government has managed to make itself extremely unpopular. It is not just that proposals to annihilate judicial independence and to remove many of the freedoms Israelis take for granted have hurt the economy—but that it has promised its Haredi allies to pass a law formally exempting Haredi youth from the military, which will enrage the vast majority of Israelis. Applying the normal calculus of Israeli politics, war could be just what Netanyahu needs to reshuffle the deck and somehow survive this episode as well. In any case, security crises usually help the right.

But this may be different. It is hard to see how Netanyahu escapes the judgement that his government—brimming as it is with ex-cons, fanatics and petty apparatchiks—fell asleep on its watch. It devoted all its energies to trying to install authoritarian rule at huge cost to social cohesion and the economy. It is not inconceivable that the dimensions of the failure will compel a certain return to respect for expertise, and some reluctance for voting for incompetents—not just in Israel, but in other countries as well. But that’s for the next election.

Right now, a possible outcome is a reshuffle leading to a centrist “national unity government” replacing Netanyahu’s far-right allies with moderate factors. The opposition leader has already proposed it, and such is the trepidation in the country that this was not seen, as it normally would have been, as a cynical ploy.

Meanwhile, it should surprise no one if Netanyahu sticks with his current assemblage. Its judicial overhaul may be critical to keeping him out of jail. Instead, he might choose to exploit the intelligence failure and move to replace the heads of the security branches; they are all accomplished professionals and therefore almost by definition opponents of his government’s policies, especially his authoritarian overhaul. He would seek to replace them with loyalists, causing Israel yet more damage but accumulating more power for himself. That is not the Israel its friends abroad admire, but anyone who would be surprised is deluded and out of date.

At the end of the day, though, the situation in Gaza is simply not tenable: Two million people with no natural resources, intermittent electricity, no free trade with the world, and no way out by land, air, or sea. Make no mistake: Hamas is a criminal organization that seeks only war with Israel and cares not a fig for the people under its boot. But Israel’s policy of trying to smoke Hamas out by putting pressure on the population was never going to lead to good things. It is, without doubt, time for a new “conception.”

Dan Perry is managing partner of the New York-based communications firm Thunder11. He is the former Cairo-based Middle East editor and London-based Europe/Africa editor of the Associated Press. Follow him at danperry.substack.com.

The views expressed in this article are the writer’s own.

Hamas’ War on Israel Offers Sobering Clarity in the Fight Against Evil

0

The attacks on Israel that began Saturday morning will undoubtedly be viewed by some as just the latest, if unusually brutal, tit-for-tat in the region’s seemingly nonstop cycle of violence.

But today is different. Today is a day that will be recorded in history as one of Israel’s darkest. And in the days and weeks to come, as the shock and fog of war recedes and the full repercussions become clear, this may be a turning point in the West’s fight against terror.

It is already clear that Palestinian terrorists have crossed a line as never before. Many nations have quickly declared that the brutality perpetrated by Palestinian terrorists is unconscionable. Yet unsurprisingly, many more nations have remained silent or, worse, sought to explain away the brutality to fit their own political perspectives and world views. They are deeply wrong.

In an era when the line between right and wrong is constantly blurred, this is a moment of sobering clarity.

Hamas has sunk to a depth of savagery that should shock us to the core. The terror group infiltrated Israel by land, air, and sea, and attacked nearby communities. They slaughtered the elderly, gunned down civilians in their homes, kidnapped mothers with babies in their arms, mutilated the bodies of men and women, and paraded their victims through the streets of Gaza in a show of celebration.

Through these and many other inhumane acts, Palestinian terrorists have shown their fight is not about settlements, checkpoints, or the myriad other policies that Israelis and Palestinians squabble over. This weekend, we saw what militant Palestinians and their supporters mean when they tell us they want the land ‘From the River to the Sea.’ They want every inch of land – every city, town, kibbutz, settlement, and village—between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, and they want it cleansed of every single Jew.

This is a moment of reckoning for every leader and institution that has spent years sending the message that Palestinians are free to respond to their real struggles and hardships by any means necessary to defeat the “Zionists.”

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas reacted to the attacks by expressing his solidarity with Palestinian people and justifying the attacks as a response to the “terror of settlers and occupation troops.” But the terrorists didn’t target settlements; they attacked communities near the Gaza border where families were at home celebrating Shabbat and the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah. There is no partner for peace to be found in a man who can’t muster the courage to condemn gunmen who held families hostage and abducted children.

This attack comes almost 50 years to the day after the country was taken by surprise in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, and at a time when the nation is grappling with internal conflicts over how to move forward as a democracy. Having persisted through 75 years of open hostility, Israel will survive this crisis as well.

Instead, this will be a defining moment for every other nation, particularly those that stand for freedom, human dignity, and the rule of law. As welcome as the many tweets of solidarity have been, we need to look ahead.

Israel is already striking targets in Gaza and undoubtedly, the fighting will continue in the days and weeks ahead as Israel battles to return its captured citizens and dismantle the terror infrastructure that planned and executed these attacks.

This will mean that destruction and devastation will be rained on Gaza, with many Palestinians killed. Soon after, a familiar cycle will begin. Upsetting images—some real, some forged by “Pallywood,” some recycled—of destroyed homes and broken Palestinian families will be splashed across front pages and circulated alongside outraged messages online.

A battle of narratives will ensue. Resolves will fade, and condemnations will commence. Social media is already filled with apologists who gleefully post images of people celebrating the death and kidnapping of Israeli children. Academics and human rights professionals are questioning why the White House is calling the terrorists “terrorists.” And pundits are defending the brutality as “armed indigenous people taking their land back from colonizers,” astutely ignoring the fact that Jews are indigenous to the land of Israel.

Many aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are open to debate as we strive for long-term stability and a time when all peoples can live with peace, security, dignity, and opportunities. But some things are not open to interpretation. One can be deeply troubled by the Palestinian’s plight and still maintain the moral clarity to recognize that certain lines should never be crossed—that we must never confuse the terrorists who target civilians with an army that targets terrorists who attack its civilians.

Every nation, institution, and leader is on notice. One day, books will be written, courses taught, and movies made about these events. History is watching, and we are all on the record.

Aviva Klompas is co-founder of Boundless, a non-profit organization that partners with community leaders to support Israel education and combat Jew hatred. She also served as director of speechwriting at the Israeli Mission to the United Nations.

The views expressed in this article are the writer’s own.

I had the Golden State Killer’s DNA. I drove to his house

0

Before he was called the Golden State Killer in a 2013 magazine story by Michelle McNamara, who would become my friend and confidant, he was known as the Original Nightstalker, and before that, the East Area Rapist, or EAR.

The titles evolved as his crimes progressed, from fetish burglaries, to vicious sexual assaults in the middle of the night, to murder. He adopted the nicknames, using them to taunt us.

I remember getting hold of an old recording of a call made during the EAR phase to Sacramento Dispatch from a man claiming to be him.

“This is the East Area Rapist, you dumb f*****s,” he says. “I’m gonna f*** again tonight. Careful.” The voice was menacing. Cocky. Taunting. Brash. I played it over and over.

“You know about this recording?” I asked Ken Clark, a detective with Sacramento Sheriff’s Homicide who’d put plenty of time in on the investigation.

“Oh yeah,” he said. “You think it’s him?”

“Likely. It really pisses me off,” I said.

“Absolutely,” Clark said. “That’s what he wanted.”

Two years after that call in 1977, his cat-and-mouse game escalated to murder.

Over the two-plus decades that I’d been looking into the cold case, I’d witnessed the suffering of the mothers and fathers and sons and daughters and brothers and sisters of some of his victims.

I’d studied the crime scene photos of his sadistic handiwork. I’d spent hours listening to the stories of men and women who, either by the grace of God or their own raw courage, had somehow survived his merciless attacks, only to be haunted still decades later by what he had done to them.

Not long ago, my cell phone rang. The woman on the other end sounded like she was about to fall apart. “I know he’s coming back to get me, so I’m moving to Mexico,” she said.

It had been thirty years since he broke into her home in the middle of the night and terrorized her family.

Those were the people who drove me relentlessly to pursue the case, and they had been counting on me to get him. “We know you’ll be the one to do it.” I’d heard that so many times. I hated disappointing her. I hated disappointing all of them.

After working the case in between other open cases, usually on my own time, I’d spent the last few years of my career making the Golden State Killer, or GSK, my top priority.

I’d scrutinized thousands of police documents and witness statements and interviewed everyone I could who was associated with the case and still alive. The obsession ran over into weekends, while I was mowing the lawn or playing with the kids.

Even on Christmas Day, when the rest of the family opened presents, it was GSK who was on my mind. And through the long nights, when I searched computer databases for clues and drew geographic profiles of his crimes to try to determine his home base, the case played like an endless movie in my head. His victims haunted my dreams.

People like Mary, one of the youngest. She was headed into eighth grade when he forced his way into her life in 1979. Barely thirteen, she still had a playhouse in the back of her home, and her hobby was hopscotch. That summer, he broke into her Walnut Creek home at four in the morning through the sliding glass doors.

As her father and sister slept in adjoining rooms, he slipped into hers. She awoke to him straddling her, a knife to her throat. “I hope you’re good,” he said in a menacing whisper. She didn’t know what he meant. He pulled off her covers and savagely raped her in her pretty pink bedroom with unicorns painted on the walls.

Mary waited nearly an hour after he was finally gone to free herself from her leg ties. He’d threatened to kill her family if she told, so she’d waited to be certain he was gone. Still shackled at the wrists, she ran to wake up her father.

All these years later, she lived with the echo of her father’s voice screaming to her sister: “Get those things off her!”

Soon after, Mary had asked a friend’s older sister: “Am I still a virgin?” Three years after the attack, she found her father dead in his bed. She was certain he died of a broken heart. I didn’t doubt it. I have two daughters. I’m not sure I could survive the grief and regret of not being able to protect my children.

Mary was robbed of her innocence and her peace of mind. She’d spent her life looking over her shoulder, wondering if he was still out there somewhere, watching. The monster had stolen so much from so many. Surely there had to be a reckoning for him.

I worried that, after I retired, no one else would take up where I had left off. The investigation would, once again, get tossed into a file cabinet and be all but forgotten—the way I’d found it—and the people who had counted on me to solve it would never forgive me.

What would happen to them, those whose lives had been ruined? How would they ever get the little bit of peace that comes with knowing?

So many times over the years I thought I was close to solving the case, only to be bitterly disappointed when I was proven wrong by DNA. The last time had been just a couple of weeks earlier, and it was gut crushing.

I’d recently discovered something within genetic genealogy called DNA segment triangulation, a process that could determine biological relationships by combining DNA profiling—which we had for GSK—with genealogical research from paid private ancestry websites.

It had gotten my attention when I’d heard it was successful in identifying a woman who was abandoned as a small child. We didn’t know who the little girl was or where she came from, and she had been too young to remember much that could help us. For years, we’d tried to identify her using traditional methods, and we’d always failed.

Then, during a conference call about another case, I’d heard that she had finally been identified using DNA segment triangulation. I started to wonder, could that same tool lead us to the Golden State Killer?

***

The yearning to go to the door was overwhelming. I should just go and introduce myself. My mind raced and my anxiety was ratcheting up again. Sitting there, I contemplated possible scenarios.

In the first one, I walk up to the front door and knock. Joe DeAngelo answers. I introduce myself: “Hi, I’m Paul Holes, Contra Costa County cold case investigator. I’ve been looking into this series of unsolved cases and . . .”

He looks curious but not suspicious. We immediately establish a rapport, bonded by the uniform. He invites me in. “How about some coffee?” he asks.

“No thanks. Never drink it.”

“How about a beer?”

After a few sips of beer and a little bit of small talk about police work and how different it is now than when he was on the force, I tell him that his name came up in the investigation. He seems bemused but not concerned.

“I guess it’s your lucky day,” I say. “One of your distant relatives uploaded DNA into a genealogy website, and that person is related to the person I’m looking for. You are likely distantly related to my offender, too.”

He nods. “Ahh. What can I do to help you out?”

“Well, I just need a DNA sample.”

I feel a little awkward asking another cop for proof he’s not a malicious serial predator. On the other hand, with the sample, I can officially eliminate him as a suspect, and he’ll never be bothered again.

“Hey, I get it,” he says. “Of course.” We both chuckle over the absurdity of the situation. I get the sample, tell him I’m sorry for the bother, and leave. It will be my final act in the case.

But there’s another possibility, the one that considers DeAngelo is the Golden State Killer.

In that scenario, I’ve already made a foolish mistake. I’ve sat there for several minutes in front of his house in my official car. Any cop or former cop would recognize it as unmarked law enforcement.

If he is the killer, I know what he’s capable of. There’s no telling what he’ll do if he feels trapped. He knows I’m here. He’s a cunning serial predator. He knew what his victims watched on TV, where they went to work and school, whose husband was out of town, whose parents were out for the evening, when people were asleep.

In this scenario, there’s no doubt he’s already seen the car sitting there through the blinds. When I walk toward his house, he recognizes me from the media interviews I’ve done on the case over the years.

By the time I get to the front door, he’s already armed himself. He may open up and shoot me before I have a chance to say a word. Or he’ll invite me in to keep me confined, excuse himself, then sneak up behind me and bash my head in.

No one would know. No one knows where I am. I didn’t radio in. I didn’t call home. I just left the office and ended up here. I take a deep breath to clear my head.

What am I doing, thinking about approaching this guy? If he is GSK, and he becomes aware that we’re on to him, it will risk the investigation. If he feels cornered, he’ll kill me. I just need to drive away, I tell myself, putting the car in gear.

It’s too early. I don’t want to blow this. I don’t know enough about this DeAngelo guy.

I start the car and will myself to put it in gear. I’m not even a block away when I begin doubting my decision. Maybe I’m blowing it. I should have gotten the DNA. I would have at least had another genealogy data point for my team.

And what if DeAngelo was the killer? I was right there. Why hadn’t I gone to the front door?

The drive home to Vacaville seemed to take forever. I was filled with regret. I had just failed to wrap up my final suspect in a case that continued to elude me. If the Golden State Killer case was ever to be solved, I would not be a part of it. I felt defeated.

The survivors had counted on me as their last chance for justice, and I’d let them down. My career would end with a blemished footnote.

It felt like an anticlimactic finish to what had been an otherwise pretty good run.

Paul Holes is a retired as a cold case investigator. He specialized in cold case and serial predator crimes, developing and applying investigative, behavioral, and forensic expertise in notable cases such as The Golden State Killer, and Jaycee Dugard.

This is an adapted excerpt from Holes’s memoir UNMASKED. The new content exclusive to the paperback, focuses on the case of Suzanne Bombardier, one that had bothered Paul throughout his career up until the killer’s recent conviction in 2022.

All views expressed in this article are the author’s own.

Do you have a unique experience or personal story to share? Email the My Turn team at myturn@newsweek.com

Back Pain? Don’t do these common household activities, say chiropractors

0

Suffer from chronic back pain while moving about at home? Even if you’re not engaging in rigorous exercises, back pain can be caused by a simple daily household activity.

David Lask, a chiropractor based in Missouri, told Newsweek: “There are some chores around the house that may help contribute to getting back pain.”

The chiropractor explained that a “repeated bending and twisting” movement, which many house chores tend to involve, is “stressful to the lumbar spine.” Performed with an added load, this movement is “especially hard on the back,” he said.

Chronic pain is among the most common chronic conditions in the U.S., according to a February 2022 study published in the peer-reviewed journal Pain. The study said “50.2 million adults (20.5 percent) reported pain on most days or every day,” with back pain among the most common pain locations, citing data from the 2019 edition of the National Health Interview Survey.

A May 2023 study published in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet Rheumatology found that “low back pain is highly prevalent and the main cause of years lived with disability (YLDs).” In 2020, low back pain affected 619 million people globally, with 843 million prevalent cases projected by 2050, according to the study.

Household Activities You Should Avoid to Prevent Back Pain

Below, chiropractors highlight some daily household activities and movements you should avoid to help prevent back pain.

Washing the Dishes

Chiropractor Anjali Agrawal told Newsweek that doing the dishes can be harmful for your back because as “human beings, we were designed for movement, not static posture.”

Therefore, standing and washing the dishes can cause us to “put our weight on one hip, or to fatigue our core muscles, which may be a little weak already, and that can create overarching of the low back,” said Agrawal, who is the founder of Back in Balance, a chiropractic practice based in Los Altos, California.

The same issues arise for other activities that entail “standing in one place for extended periods of time,” such as chopping vegetables at a kitchen counter. “Similar to washing dishes, this can cause low back strain,” she said.

Obviously, washing the dishes can’t be avoided entirely, especially if you don’t have a dishwasher. However, there are ways to modify your stance while doing the activity.

Lask, who is the founder of Ask Dr. Lask, a chiropractic practice based in Crestwood, Missouri, said: “When doing dishes, try not to bend or flex forward over the sink; but instead stand taller and more erect to decrease the stress and strain on the thoracic and lumbar spine.”

Agrawal suggests opening the cabinet door under the sink and propping one foot on top of the bottom edge or placing your foot on a stool. “You can alternate [your feet] if you like or keep the one foot there—whatever feels comfortable to you,” she said.

She explained: “This allows you to distribute your weight between both legs as well as prevents the overarching of the low back.”

Vacuuming, Sweeping and Mopping

Agrawal and Lask say that vacuuming—as well as other chores such as sweeping and mopping and even doing laundry—can cause back pain due to the bending and twisting movement involved.

Agrawal said many people typically bend forward when pushing their vacuum cleaner. “While this may feel easier, bending forward causes us to contract our psoas muscle, one of our main hip flexors.”

Since one side of the psoas muscle attaches to our back, this can often present as back pain, she noted.

Lask said the bending and twisting movement is particularly bad for your back due to the design of the lower lumbar spine.

He explained: “There is a ligament called the posterior longitudinal ligament that runs the length of the spine to stabilize and support the posterior aspect of the gelatinous discs. This important ligament tapers as it reaches the lowest segments of L4/L5 and L5/S1.

“These discs are filled with a jelly-like substance in the nucleus pulposus, which is the center of the disc. This pressurized disc will bulge or rupture through the tree-ring like structures called annular fibers,” he added.

The “rotation and flexion” movement that occurs with vacuuming and the other aforementioned household activities “increases the tensile forces on the lower lumbar discs and increase the odds of rupturing or herniating a disc.”

Agrawal suggests aiming to point your hips up towards the sky, particularly when pushing something like a vacuum (or even a stroller or a grocery cart) to allow your hip flexors to stretch.

Lask advises avoiding certain movements that include flexing forward and rotating simultaneously.

“When lifting an item like a clothes basket, square up to the item, then bend the legs and lift with your legs straight up and then make your turn. When sweeping, vacuuming, mopping try to stand more erect and not so bent over as you twist,” he said.

Do you have a health-related question or dilemma? Let us know via life@newsweek.com. We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

Zelensky snubbed for Nobel Peace Prize after being clear favorite

0

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has lost out on the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize, despite being a frontrunner.

Writing on X, formerly Twitter, the committee announced the prize has been awarded to Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian human-rights activist. She is serving a sentence of 10 years and 9 months, accused propaganda against the Iranian state and actions against national security.

The Nobel Prize announced on X: “The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the 2023 #NobelPeacePrize to Narges Mohammadi for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran and her fight to promote human rights and freedom for all.”

Zelensky was a favorite to win the much-lauded international prize, with Nicer Odds placing his chances of winning at +220 in the U.S.

Speaking to CNN, Henrik Urdal, director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo, said many bookmakers cynically tipped Zelensky for the award simply because he name is well-known.

While betting houses may have placed the Ukrainian leader at the front of the pack, Nobel Prize experts were less convinced he would win. Dan Smith, director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, told CNN: “It would be like saying in 1941 that (then British Prime Minister) Winston Churchill should get the Nobel Peace Prize. What he was doing at the time was trying to win a war. That’s what Zelensky is trying to do now.”

“My view is, if and when he gets the chance to lead his country into peace, then he will probably get the award and be widely seen as a very worthy winner,” Smith added.

“Bookmakers here are trying to find candidates that people are willing to put money on—well, lose money on,” Urdal added. “I don’t consider that to reflect any real information about the likelihood of him getting the prize.”

Announcing Mohammadi as the winner, Berit Reiss-Andersen, the chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee who announced the prize in Oslo, said: “This prize is first and foremost a recognition of the very important work of a whole movement in Iran with its undisputed leader, Nargis Mohammadi.

“The impact of the prize is not for the Nobel committee to decide upon. We hope that it is an encouragement to continue the work in whichever form this movement finds to be fitting.”

Reiss-Andersen also said Mohammadi has been imprisoned 13 times and convicted five times. In total, she has been sentenced to 31 years in jail for her work as an activist.

“In September 2022, Mahsa Jina Amini was killed in Iranian morality police’s custody, triggering political demonstrations against Iran’s regime,” the Nobel Prize wrote on X.

“The motto adopted by the demonstrators – ‘Woman – Life – Freedom’ – suitably expresses the dedication and work of Narges Mohammadi.”

Amini, a 22-year-old Iranian woman, died unexpectedly in September 2022 while in custody of Iran’s Gasht-e Ershad, otherwise known as the morality police. Prior to her death she was arrested for wearing improper clothing after she allegedly broke a law that demands women cover their hair with a headscarf as well as their arms and legs. The slogan became synonymous with Amini after widespread women’s rights protests erupted across Iran.

In 2022, the prize was awarded to the Ukrainian human rights organization Center for Civil Liberties, jointly with human rights advocate Ales Bialiatski from Belarus and the Russian human rights organization Memorial. The choice was interpreted as a strong rebuke to Russian President Vladimir Putin for his invasion of Ukraine.

Oleksandra Matviichuk, head of the Center for Civil Liberties, wrote on X following the announcement of Mohammadi’s 2023 win: “I welcome the Nobel Committee’s decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Narges Mohammadi for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran. We live in a very interconnected world. Right now, people in Iran are fighting for freedom. Our future depends on their success.”

Western nations believe Iran has supported Russia’s invasion of Ukraine with the supply weapons and ammunition, although the matter remains disputed. White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said in May this year: “Iran also continues to provide Russia with one-way attack UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles). Since August, Iran has provided Russia with more than 400 UAVs primarily of the Shahed variety.

“Russia has expended most of these UAVs, using them to target Ukrainian critical infrastructure inside Ukraine. By providing Russia with these UAVs, Iran has been directly enabling Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine.”

Tehran and Moscow have both denied that Iran is supplying weapons to Russia for use in Ukraine.

Matviichuk continued: “It is more than obvious for Ukraine. I live in Kyiv, which is regularly bombarded by Russian missiles and Iranian drones. If authoritarian regimes cooperate, then people fighting for freedom have to support each other much more strongly.”

This year, the Nobel Prize committee reviewed 351 nominations — 259 for individuals and 92 for organizations. Those who can make nominations include former Nobel Peace Prize winners, members of the committee, heads of states, members of parliaments, as well as esteemed professors of political science, history and international law.

Following the October announcement, prizes are handed out in ceremony in December. It is unknown is Mohammadi will be able to receive her award in person.

Newsweek has contacted the Nobel Prize Committee for comment.

Update 10/06.23 8:15 a.m. ET: This story has been updated with additional information for context.

How Ukraine is "neutralizing" Russia’s biggest advantage

0

Ukrainian forces pushing their counteroffensive in the southeast of the country are “neutralizing” Russia’s numerical advantage, a retired American general has said, even if they have so far been denied the decisive breakthrough that Kyiv’s Western partners were hoping for.

Retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, who served as the commander of U.S. Army Europe, told Newsweek that the Ukrainian decision to prioritize Russian artillery, headquarters, and logistics hubs is part of a larger strategic plan not necessarily focused on territorial gains.

“I think most people are looking at this with the wrong context,” Hodges said of the months-old counteroffensive, the slow pace of which has raised concerns in the West that Ukraine’s troops will not be able to eject Russian troops from the occupied south of the country. Such fears have prompted fresh talk of negotiations that might see Kyiv forced to surrender territory and its ambition to join NATO.

“What I think Ukrainians have done correctly is to focus their efforts on destroying artillery, destroying headquarters, destroying logistics,” Hodges said.

“This is how you neutralize the only advantage the Russians have—the advantage of mass—by taking away their headquarters, taking away the artillery that’s required to support them and make it difficult for Ukrainians to get through minefields, and then finally the logistics: taking out ammunition and transportation.”

“Think about what the counteroffensive is for,” Hodges added. “It is for achieving some operational level objectives, and you don’t do that with just ground forces. You have to use what NATO calls ‘multidomain’—air, land, sea, cyber, information, special forces—all of the different domains. That’s U.S. doctrine, that’s NATO doctrine, and that’s exactly what the Ukrainians are doing.”

Newsweek has contacted the Russian Defense Ministry by email to request comment.

The Ukrainian thrust appears intended to sever the so-called “land bridge” of southern Ukraine, which—while Russian troops remain in place—connects occupied Crimea to western Russia. The bridge stands as one of President Vladimir Putin‘s few tangible strategic successes of the full-scale invasion to date and could serve as a spine for future Russian expansion all along the Ukrainian Black Sea coast.

Success for Ukraine’s offensive and the collapse of the land bridge could spell disaster for the Kremlin. If combined with the destruction of the Kerch Strait Bridge—the span erected to connect Crimea with Russia by rail and road after its annexation in 2014—the significant Russian military grouping on the peninsula would be isolated and starved of supply.

“The land domain, of course, is aimed at the eventual isolation of Crimea,” Hodges said of the ongoing Ukrainian operation. “You’ve got to start with that. Everything they’re doing is aimed at Crimea. And the way you get Crimea is to isolate it, make it untenable, and then you can liberate it.”

“The land efforts that are going through all these little-known villages, minefields and trenches, what they’re trying to do is to sever the land bridge that connects Russia to Crimea. And that’s a critical part of the isolation of Crimea. They can do that either if they make it all the way or they get weapon systems that can make it impossible for Russians to move up and down the so-called land bridge.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is among the Ukrainian leaders who have admitted that the offensive is progressing “slower than desired.” Officials in Kyiv remain publicly bullish about their chances for success, despite murmurings of discontent within the president’s inner circle previously revealed by Newsweek.

Ukrainian commanders have reportedly even clashed with their U.S. counterparts—who remain Kyiv’s most important backers—over the conduct and progress of the counteroffensive.

Hodges said critical voices in the Pentagon should think twice. “There’s no way we would send an American soldier to do what the Ukrainians are having to do, because we would never go in there without air superiority,” he said.

“Any criticism of how the Ukrainians are doing it, or how they’re not going fast enough, is really wrong and misplaced.”

Putin’s forgetfulness at conference raises questions

0

Russian President Vladimir Putin made a few slip ups while giving a wide-ranging speech at an annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, raising questions from social media users.

During the meeting, in which Putin said Russia aims to “build a new world,” the president messed up a very simple Russian saying, appeared to forget the name of an individual who he was asked about just months ago, and contradicted himself when talking about the existence of private military companies (PMCs) in the country.

Putin responded during the session to an accusation by the Chairman of the European Council, Charles Michel, who said on October 3 that Russia “betrayed” the Armenian people. Michel said Russia failed to defend Nagorno-Karabakh during Azerbaijan’s brief military offensive last month that caused the region’s ethnic Armenian population to flee to Armenia.

“You know, our people say: ‘Whose horse would moo, but yours would be silent,'” Putin said, before he was interrupted and corrected by the moderator of the discussion, Fyodor Lukyanov.

“A cow,” Lukyanov clarified.

“Cow, horse, it doesn’t matter. An animal, in short,” the president added, laughing his error off.

The Russian saying is typically aimed at those who speak carelessly and in a judgmental manner, and is often used in response to accusations. An English equivalent would be “the pot calling the kettle black.”

In the same meeting in Sochi, Putin claimed not to know Russian sociologist and Kremlin critic Boris Kagarlitsky, who was arrested on July 26 on “justification of terrorism” charges and faces up to seven years in prison. That’s despite Putin commenting on his case just days after he was detained.

When Putin was asked to release Kagarlitsky on Thursday, he responded: “To be honest, I don’t know who Kagarlitsky is. I’ll take your paper, look and respond. I promise.”

And the Russian leader contradicted himself once more when talking about the existence of PMCs in the country.

He said a few thousand former fighters of “PMC” Wagner Group had signed contracts with the Russian Defense Ministry. A few moments later, he said no PMCs exist in Russia, and never did.

Putin has made several U-turns on the existence and use of mercenaries in Russia.

On September 29, the Kremlin announced that Putin met with Andrey Troshev, a former commander of the Wagner Group, to discuss the formation of “volunteer units” that can “perform various combat tasks” in Ukraine.

That’s after Putin said in July that the Wagner Group “does not exist” in accordance to Russian laws and that it would be absorbed in the Russian Defense Ministry following an uprising and march on Moscow led by the group’s late leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin, on June 24.

Prior to the Wagner Group’s involvement in the war in Ukraine, the Kremlin had repeatedly denied its existence, claiming to have no knowledge of the organization. The Kremlin maintained that mercenaries are illegal under Russian law and that private military security companies would also not be permitted under its legislation to offer services outside of Russia.

But Putin changed course days after Prigozhin’s mutiny and admitted to having fully funded the Wagner Group and its operations.

The Russian president appeared to change his mind just weeks later, according to Russian daily newspaper Kommersant. When asked whether the Wagner Group would remain a fighting unit, Putin appeared to become agitated.

“Well, the Wagner Group does not exist!” Putin said, according to Kommersant. The Russian leader reportedly said there is no law in Russia relating to private military companies.

His latest remarks on Thursday about PMCs in Russia similarly did not add up.

Social media users suggested Putin has “gone crazy,” that he was “talking nonsense,” and that he could have issues with his memory.

Newsweek has contacted Russia’s Foreign Ministry for comment via email.

Do you have a tip on a world news story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about the Russia-Ukraine war? Let us know via worldnews@newsweek.com.