Thursday, March 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 70

Newt Gingrich demands GOP "traitors" be primaried for ousting McCarthy

0

Newt Gingrich has slammed the eight Republicans who voted to oust Kevin McCarthy from the post of House Speaker as “traitors.”

Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida orchestrated the effort by filing a “motion to vacate,” sparked by McCarthy’s recent decision to work with Democrats to avoid a federal government shutdown.

The resolution passed on Tuesday with the support of eight Republicans—many of them the same hard-right lawmakers who had tried to stop McCarthy becoming Speaker in January—and all the Democrats present and voting.

The vote made McCarthy the first Speaker of the House in U.S. history to be voted out of the position by his colleagues.

The Republicans who voted to remove McCarthy were Gaetz, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Ken Buck of Colorado, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Eli Crane of Arizona, Bob Good of Virginia, Nancy Mace of South Carolina and Matt Rosendale of Montana.

“They are traitors,” Gingrich, a former House Speaker, said during an appearance on Fox News.

“All eight of them should in fact be primaried. They should all be driven out of public life. What they did was to go to the other team to cause total chaos.”

Gingrich noted that 96 percent of the Republican conference had voted for McCarthy in January.

“We ought to be focusing on Biden, we ought to be focusing on the economy, we ought to be focusing on the border,” he said.

“Instead, you’re going to get a week or 10 days of the media focusing on Republican disarray. It’s an astonishingly destructive behavior by a handful of egocentric people who think they’re superior to 96 percent of the conference.”

In a statement provided to Newsweek, Gingrich added that the eight Republicans “are traitors in a political sense.”

He said: “Imagine [the University of Georgia] is playing Alabama in football and four of the UGA defensive linemen turn around and tackle their own quarterback. What would you call that? Gaetz and his accomplices have betrayed their colleagues by plunging the House into chaos. They have been totally destructive to the conservative efforts to check this administration and do good things for the American people.”

The eight Republicans who voted to oust McCarthy have been contacted for comment via email.

Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, a McCarthy ally, was named speaker pro tempore and will serve until a successor is chosen.

McCarthy told lawmakers he would not run again.

The Republicans who voted against him are “not conservatives and they do not have the right to have the title,” McCarthy told reporters.

He reserved harsh words for Gaetz. “You all know Matt Gaetz,” he added. “You know it was personal…everything he accused somebody of, he was doing. That all was about getting attention from [the press]. I mean, we’re getting email fundraisers from him as he’s doing it. ‘Join in quickly.’ That’s not governing, that’s not becoming of a member of Congress.”

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries called McCarthy’s removal “a solemn moment for the country and for the House of Representatives.”

House Democrats “will continue to put people over politics and work together in a bipartisan way to make life better for everyday Americans,” he said in a statement.

“It is our hope that traditional Republicans will walk away from MAGA extremism and join us in partnership for the good of the country.”

President Joe Biden hopes the House will quickly elect McCarthy’s successor, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement.

“Once the House has met their responsibility to elect a Speaker, he looks forward to working together with them and with the Senate to address the American people’s priorities,” she said.

Update 10/04/23, 9:55 a.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional comments from Newt Gingrich.

Exclusive: 300 patients sue Columbia University over doctor’s sexual abuse

0

More than 300 women are suing Columbia University, accusing the institution of “enabling” the serial sex abuser Robert Hadden, who was a gynecologist in its affiliated hospital system.

Hadden was sentenced to 20 years in prison in July after being convicted of four counts of inducing four women to travel interstate to his medical offices so he could sexually abuse them.

U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman, who sentenced Hadden in federal court, said the case involved “outrageous, horrific, beyond extraordinary, depraved sexual abuse.” Judge Berman also pointed out that at least 245 of Hadden’s former patients have alleged he abused them.

The institutions where Hadden worked, including the Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, have already agreed to pay more than $236 million to settle civil claims brought by more than 200 former patients.

Now attorney Anthony DiPietro has filed on behalf of another 301 former patients against the university and its affiliated hospital system, under the Adult Survivors Act. This law gives victims of sexual abuse a temporary window, which ends on November 23, in which New York’s usual statue of limitations for civil lawsuits is set aside.

The defendants “willingly enabled, aided, abetted, concealed and repeatedly covered up” Hadden’s abuse, DiPietro wrote in the complaint, which was filed in the New York Supreme Court on Tuesday and reviewed by Newsweek.

Asked for comment on the new lawsuit, a Columbia spokesperson told Newsweek on Wednesday that it is “profoundly sorry for the pain that Robert Hadden’s patients suffered and his exploitation of their trust.

“The prosecution of Hadden that led to his conviction of federal crimes showed how he purposely worked to evade our oversight and engineer situations to abuse his patients.”

Laurie Maldonado, an adjunct assistant professor at the Columbia School of Social Work and a client of DiPietro, is also pursuing a separate civil claim alleging that the university enabled Hadden’s abuse.

Hadden groomed, assaulted and abused her at gynaecological appointments when she was his patient between 2003 and 2012, she told Newsweek.

This included prolonged, medically unnecessary and inappropriate breast and vaginal exams, she said.

On some occasions, a nurse in the room with Maldonado and Hadden “witnessed the verbal and physical exploitation, abuse and assaults firsthand” but “nothing was done to prevent or stop Hadden’s misconduct,” according to court documents reviewed by Newsweek.

Maldonado was 40 weeks pregnant and close to labor when she went to Hadden’s office for what was supposed to be a routine prenatal exam in October 2011. Hadden took her behind a curtain, out of her then-husband’s view, and digitally penetrated her—an assault that included “an overt act of sadism,” the documents said.

“My husband heard me scream,” Maldonado said. “He asked me, do you feel violated? And I said yes.”

Maldonado delivered her son less than 48 hours later. Hadden’s assault, she said, was worse than natural childbirth.

“I couldn’t eat, I couldn’t walk, I was in so much pain,” she said. “And my husband just took me out of the room. I think at that moment, we just said, the baby’s coming and we have to focus on the baby. So that’s what we did.”

Maldonado returned for an appointment with Hadden six months after giving birth and was informed that he had taken leave. She was not told that Hadden had been arrested in June 2012 after a patient reported that he had touched her sexually during an exam.

She was on the subway in 2013 when she found out, after spotting the “GYNO IS SICKO” headline in a copy of the New York Daily News that another passenger was reading.

Hadden was indicted in 2014 after other women came forward with allegations. The charges included five counts of a criminal sexual act, two counts of forcible touching and two counts of sexual abuse.

But a deal with the Manhattan district attorney’s office in 2016 allowed Hadden to plead guilty to a single felony count of criminal sexual act in the third degree and a misdemeanor count of forcible touching. He was required to give up his medical license, but avoided prison.

Last month a joint investigation by ProPublica and New York magazine alleged that Columbia had failed to act on years of evidence Hadden was sexually assaulting patients.

Columbia allowed Hadden to practice for five weeks after he was reported to police by a patient, the report said. At least eight other women Hadden saw during those five weeks allege that he assaulted them, according to the article’s authors Bianca Fortis and Laura Beil.

The university “failed to hand over evidence in its possession despite subpoenas that compelled it to do so,” wrote Fortis and Beil, and did not inform the district attorney’s office when more patients came forward with allegations.

In addition, the university reportedly waited months to tell Hadden’s patients that he was no longer working and eventually sent “Dear Patient” letters that omitted the reason why.

Maldonado told Newsweek that she had never received a letter.

The Columbia spokesperson told Newsweek on Wednesday: “We also deeply regret, based on what we know today, that Hadden saw patients for several weeks following his voided arrest in 2012. Columbia then banned Hadden from his medical practice, and he has not worked as a doctor for 11 years.”

The spokesperson added that CUIMC’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology “has revised existing policies, adopted new ones, and expanded resources to earn and maintain patients’ trust. The Department’s overriding commitment to patient safety is expressed through continuous evaluation and improvement of practices and services to create an environment where patients not only are safe—but feel safe.”

But DiPietro has written in the new complaint that Columbia knew as early as 1994 that Hadden was abusing patients.

“Instead of taking action … what [the defendants] did instead was to conspire with [Hadden], conceal his crimes from the authorities, and gas-light their patients, while enabling and aiding [Hadden] in becoming the most prolific serial sexual predator in New York State history,” he wrote.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include doctors, lawyers, professors and nurses, DiPietro told Newsweek.

DiPietro represented 147 patients who reached an agreement with Columbia for $165 million in October 2022. A settlement in the new lawsuit could amount to more than $1 billion, he said.

“The only thing Columbia cares about is their money and, to maybe a lesser extent, their reputation,” he said. “And if that’s the case, fine. I want to hit them as hard as I can, as many times as possible. So, after this is done, they remember our clients, they remember me and they don’t let this happen to anyone else in the future.”

In the complaint, DiPietro noted that more than $2 billion has been paid to victims and survivors of doctor-patient sexual abuse in the U.S.

“Most of those other places have had the decency to acknowledge where they’ve fallen short, have notified the patients who were impacted, and have apologized to patients,” he wrote.

He added that Columbia and the defendants “stand alone in refusing to admit to their complicity, conspiracy, concealment, and cover-up of [Hadden’s] long history of the sexual exploitation and abuse that was happening right in front of them.”

DiPietro has also filed a petition in the New York State Supreme Court seeking an order that will require the New York State Department of Health and Columbia to notify all of Hadden’s patients about their exposure to a sexual predator.

“Columbia has never done it,” he said. “We’ve been pushing them to do it.”

A week after the ProPublica and New York investigation was published, Minouche Shafik, Columbia University’s president, and Katrina Armstrong, the CEO of CUIMC, released a statement saying that Columbia “continues to grapple with the magnitude of harm done” by Hadden.

“We are heartbroken for those who have suffered and continue to suffer from these terrible actions. Hadden will spend the rest of his life in prison thanks to these courageous women,” the statement said.

“We commend them for coming forward. We offer our deepest apologies to all his victims and their loved ones.”

Shafik and Armstrong said the university has continued to “enhance the policies and processes in place to afford our patients a safe environment of care, and we remain committed to strengthening the safeguards that are essential for earning patient trust.”

Maldonado said these words amounted to “a slap in the face,” adding: “That’s not an apology.”

Other survivors have also condemned Columbia’s statement.

“There is no ownership of the university’s past—and ongoing— failures,” said a statement from Evelyn Yang and Marissa Hoechstetter.

“Instead, it comes from a place of self-preservation, a continuation of Columbia’s 35-year refusal to acknowledge that they enabled and protected Hadden’s abuse. Columbia failed to protect patients and get rid of this known sexual predator.”

Maldonado said she and other survivors were calling for an external review.

“We want accountability from Columbia,” she said. “I was frozen in the room with Hadden, and I didn’t report then. But I’m here now. I’m not afraid and I’m going to use my voice to make change.”

Russia is committing "rampant human rights violations" in Ukraine: UN

0

Russia is committing “widespread torture and ill-treatment” of civilians and prisoners of war (POWs) in Ukraine, according to the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner.

The UN said on Wednesday that Moscow was responsible for nearly 10,000 civilian deaths and had committed “rampant human rights violations” since invading Ukraine almost 20 months ago. A report published by the UN human rights monitor on the same day summarizes “severe and widespread harm to civilians” and alleged atrocities from February 1 to July 31, 2023.

“The report’s findings show the war’s deadly toll on Ukraine’s civilians with almost six people dying and 20 suffering injuries on average every single day,” Danielle Bell, head of the UN’s human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine, said in a statement. “In just six months covered by this report more than one thousand civilians died and nearly four thousand were injured.”

“The war has wreaked havoc in the lives of millions of Ukrainians, including children who will have to live with horrific legacy of human loss, physical destruction, environmental damage, particularly contamination from explosive remnants of war, for many years to come,” added Bell.

The UN described Russia’s alleged imposition of “appalling conditions of detention” for Ukrainian prisoners, while noting “severe beatings, electrocution, mock executions, sexual violence and degrading treatment.”

Although Russia has purportedly refused to allow direct observation of the treatment of its prisoners, the UN said that Ukraine “continues to grant human rights monitors unfettered access to interned POWs.”

Newsweek reached out for comment to the Russian Ministry of Defense via email on Wednesday night.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense noted that the UN report details “another six cases of extrajudicial executions of Ukrainian prisoners of war” by Russian forces.

The deaths purportedly included two Ukrainian prisoners who were killed while performing forced labor in the Donetsk region and two Ukrainian solders who were shot dead after being captured in the Chernihiv region.

The UN said there were “reasonable grounds” to declare that two online videos purporting to show the brutal deaths of two additional Ukrainian soldiers were authentic. One of the videos shows a Ukrainian soldier being beheaded and the other shows one being killed by gunfire after shouting, “Glory to Ukraine!

The alleged abduction of Ukrainian children by Russian authorities was also noted. The UN shared “concern about the fate of Ukrainian children” who were “transferred from their regular places of residence to other locations within the areas occupied by Russia or deported to Russia.”

Russia was not alone in being accused of committing war crimes. The human rights monitor said that it had “documented the summary execution or torture to death of 25 Russian POWs and 21 Ukrainian POWs (all men).”

Scott Hall’s guilty plea is "perilous" for Sidney Powell: Kirschner

0

Former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell is in a “perilous” position as one of her co-defendants in the 2020 Georgia election subversion case is “almost certainly” set to provide “incriminating” testimony against her, according to legal analyst Glenn Kirschner.

Powell, who famously promised to “release the Kraken” with a series of unsuccessful lawsuits claiming that former President Donald Trump‘s 2020 election loss was caused by massive fraud, in August was indicted alongside the ex-president and 17 others on felony charges related to election interference in Fulton County.

Bail bondsman Scott Hall pleaded guilty to several misdemeanors last week as part of a plea agreement that requires him to testify against others. Powell and her fellow lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, the alleged architect in the “fake electors” scheme, requested speedy trials and are due to be tried together on October 23.

Kirschner, a staunch critic of Trump and former federal prosecutor, suggested during the latest episode of his Justice Matters podcast on Wednesday that Hall would be providing devastating testimony against Powell when the trial begins. Powell and Hall were both initially charged in a plot to illegally access voting machines in Coffee County.

“When Sidney Powell’s trial kicks off, Scott Hall will almost certainly testify,” Kirschner said. “And will almost certainly be a sharply and deeply incriminating witness against Sidney Powell … At the end of that trial, I have a feeling we’re going to see that Georgia jury return verdicts of guilty.”

Kirschner also said that Hall’s agreement to testify may act as a legal “domino,” with the potential to “knock Sidney Powell over and right smack into a guilty plea herself.”

Newsweek reached out for comment to Powell’s attorney, Brian Rafferty, via email on Wednesday night.

Kirschner is far from the only legal expert to suggest that Hall’s plea deal could spell trouble for Powell and other Georgia co-defendants. Some have suggested that the arrangement may result in a chain of events that could ultimately prove disastrous for Trump.

“You can bet that at least 1/2 the defendants in Fulton County are right this second on the phones to their attorneys trying to suss out Hall’s deal and what they might be able to get if they come in quickly,” former federal prosecutor Harry Litman wrote on X, formerly Twitter, shortly after news of Hall’s agreement emerged.

Powell has pleaded not guilty to seven felony counts in Fulton County, including racketeering, conspiracy to commit election fraud, conspiracy to commit computer trespass and conspiracy to defraud the state.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 13 felony charges in Georgia and 78 other felonies across three additional criminal indictments this year, claiming to be the victim of a “witch hunt” and “election interference” while he campaigns as the leading GOP candidate in the 2024 race for the White House.

Morgan State University Shooting: What we know as multiple victims struck

0

Gunfire erupted on the campus of Morgan State University in Baltimore, Maryland, on Tuesday night, injuring several, according to police.

The Baltimore Police Department (BPD) said officers responded to an “active shooter situation” on the 1700 block of Argonne Drive and asked students to shelter in place. Police later confirmed that there were “multiple victims” shot.

Morgan State posted in a separate alert on X, formerly Twitter, asking the campus community to avoid Thurgood Marshall Hall and the Murphy Fine Arts Center.

Police posted an update on X later Tuesday night, saying that the shooting was no longer considered active, but asked students to remain sheltered in place.

BPD spokesperson Vernon Davis told the Baltimore Banner that there were at least four shooting victims. The severity of the injuries were unclear at the time of publication.

Baltimore City Fire Department Director of Communications Kevin Cartwright also told CNN that there was a “preliminary report of four individuals shot.” The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Baltimore said that its agents are also assisting police in the investigation.

The BPD and Morgan State officials asked for “concerned family members to avoid the campus area.” It was unclear if police have detained a suspect.

Morgan State, a historically Black university in northeastern Baltimore, had a 2022 fall enrollment of roughly 9,100 students. The Associated Press (AP) reported that Tuesday’s shooting occurred a few hours after the university’s annual coronation of Mister and Miss Morgan State University, an event held at the Murphy Fine Arts Center. The university is scheduled to celebrate its homecoming on Saturday.

It is also unknown if any students were involved in the shooting. A spokesperson for the BPD told Newsweek via email that the department’s social media accounts could be monitored for additional information.

According to a previous report from AP, a 20-year-old man who was not enrolled at Morgan State was shot at what was described as an unsanctioned homecoming “after party” on campus in October 2022.

Another student was shot in October 2021 by a fellow Morgan State freshman in a parking lot following the school’s homecoming football game. According to WHAR, the shooter, who was later identified as 18-year-old Marcellus Walls, got into a fight with the victim before the gunfire.

Nearly half of Americans support Kevin McCarthy’s removal: Poll

0

Almost half of U.S. adults support or strongly support the ousting of Congressman Kevin McCarthy from the House speaker’s chair, according to a poll conducted Wednesday by YouGov.

The Republican from California made history as the first speaker to be removed by the House of Representatives, in a 216-210 vote Tuesday. Eight of McCarthy’s GOP colleagues joined with all House Democrats in attendance to oust the former majority leader.

According to the 1,913 adults surveyed by YouGov, 46 percent of American voters agree that McCarthy should have been ousted. Around 28 percent responded that they either disapproved or strongly disapproved of removing the former speaker.

The results did not vary much across political parties. Over half of Democrats (55 percent) said they supported or strongly supported removing McCarthy, compared to 45 percent of Republican respondents. In the most recent weekly Economist/YouGov poll, which concluded just before the House voted on McCarthy, only 26 percent of 1,500 voters said they had a favorable or very favorable view of the former speaker.

According to YouGov’s previous findings, McCarthy’s popularity among U.S. voters dipped during his roughly eight months as speaker. In the week prior to McCarthy being selected as speaker in January, roughly 32 percent of 1,500 American adults said they viewed him favorable or very favorable.

McCarthy had faced criticism from some far-right members of the GOP caucus for months prior to his ousting, which was prompted by Florida Representative Matt Gaetz in a motion to vacate filed Monday. Republican lawmakers who supported the motion said their decision was made based on McCarthy’s failure to deliver on a number of conservative policies.

During a press conference Tuesday night, McCarthy announced that he would not be running for speaker again, leaving the GOP without a clear leader ahead of next week when the House intends to reconvene to vote on the next speaker.

McCarthy also attacked the “trustworthiness” of the Republicans who voted against him, claiming the eight lawmakers are “not conservatives and they do not have the right to have the title.”

“You all know Matt Gaetz,” McCarty added. “You know it was personal … everything he accused somebody of, he was doing. That all was about getting attention from [the press].”

A separate YouGov poll conducted on Wednesday found that 47 percent of Americans believe that the Republicans who voted to oust McCarthy were motivated more by a “desire to seek more power for themselves” than having concerns about McCarthy’s performance.

Alex Patton, Republican strategist, previously told Newsweek that the motion to vacate was a smart move on Gaetz’s part should the congressman want to pursue a political office with more influence.

“Gaetz just became the early frontrunner for Florida’s Governor’s race in two years,” Patton added.

Newsweek reached out to McCarthy and Gaetz’s offices via email for comment Wednesday evening.

Trump lashes out at John Kelly after brutal criticism

0

Former President Donald Trump dismissed his ex-Chief of Staff John Kelly‘s criticism as “lies” and “fake stories” a day after the former White House official went on the record with CNN, reiterating accounts of Trump’s belittling of U.S. troops.

In an exclusive statement published by CNN on Tuesday, Kelly, the longest-serving White House chief of staff under Trump, from 2017 to 2019, reiterated several statements Trump reportedly made behind closed doors attacking U.S. service members and veterans, many of which appeared in a 2020 story by The Atlantic.

Among Trump’s statements shared by Kelly included instances where the former president reportedly called service members “losers” and “suckers” because “there is nothing in it for them.” The former chief of staff also accused Trump of not wanting to have wounded veterans in his presence because “it doesn’t look good for me,” and for not being “truthful” about his position on abortion, “on women, on minorities, on evangelical Christians, on Jews, on working men and women.”

In a post to Truth Social Wednesday, Trump called Kelly, “the dumbest of my Military people,” adding that Kelly was “incapable of doing a good job, it was too much for him, and I couldn’t stand the guy, so I fired him like a ‘dog.'”

“He had no heart or respect for people, so I hit him hard—Made no difference to me,” Trump continued. “He’s already on record defending me all over the place. Nobody loves the Military like I do!”

“He’s a Lowlife with a very small brain and a very big mouth,” the former president added. “Numerous people are angry and upset because they know they will never be in a new Trump Administration, but only for one reason, they’re not nearly good enough. Kelly would be among those at the top of the list!”

Kelly, a retired U.S. Marine Corps general, told CNN that Trump had “no idea what America stands for” and that he “admires autocrats and murderous dictators.” He also accused Trump of having “nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution and the rule of law.”

“There is nothing more that can be said,” Kelly concluded in his statement. “God help us.”

In a previous report from The Atlantic, several sources close to Trump shared stories of the former president canceling a visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris, France, in 2018, telling his staff, “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.”

In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump also reportedly referred to the over 1,800 Marines who were killed in the 1918 Belleau Wood battle as “suckers.”

Newsweek reached out to Trump’s press team via email for additional comment Wednesday night.

Trump has a habit of attacking his critics over social media, including a recent dig at a New York law clerk that earned him a gag order in the civil fraud lawsuit filed against him by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Special Counsel Jack Smith has also requested that a gag order be placed on Trump’s public speech in the federal case accusing the former president of illegally attempting to remain in power after losing to President Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

Last week, Trump went on a rant about retired U.S. Army General Mark Milley, who seemed to refer to Trump as a “wannabe dictator” during his retirement speech. The former president, who has suggested that Milley would be executed for “treason” in “times gone by,” shot back at the former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, calling him “slow moving” in a post to Truth Social.

Trump attended trial to "play victim and raise money": Legal analyst

0

Former President Donald Trump‘s rare appearance in a New York City courtroom for his civil fraud lawsuit trial may benefit him in several ways, according to a legal expert, while an ex-New York assistant attorney general said Trump “embarrassed himself, whined in front of the cameras and begged for money from his supporters.”

Trump is facing a $250 million suit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has accused the former president, his sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., and The Trump Organization of inflating the value of the company’s assets for financial gains. Trial began on Monday for the case, although Judge Arthur Engoron has already ruled that Trump and his partners overvalued several of his properties on financial statements.

After day three of trial, MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin offered insight into why Trump, who has been notably absent during other court proceedings, may have chosen to attend this week, noting first that the New York case allowed Trump to dip out on a deposition in Florida court for a lawsuit he filed against his former lawyer, Michael Cohen.

“But the more likely explanation, I think, is that Trump believed he could achieve a number of other, short-term goals simply by showing up,” Rubin wrote in an analysis for MSNBC.

“First, he was able to physically show his contempt for—and potentially rattle— witnesses, the judge, prosecutors and [James] herself just by being there,” she continued.

Observers at the trial Wednesday noted that the former president was caught glaring toward James while exiting the courtroom. Rubin said that Trump, who often takes to Truth Social to attack his critics, doesn’t need social media “if, through your presence alone, you can scare the full range of trial participants in person and without saying a word.”

Rubin also noted that Trump’s appearance in court allows him to “spin” the lawsuit to the media, and that may be a distraction to the trial itself. The former president has maintained his innocence and deemed any legal challenges against him as part of a “witch hunt” to upset his reelection plans.

“But perhaps most importantly, Trump came to court to play victim and raise money,” Rubin said. “The leading GOP presidential candidate told reporters that he was ‘stuck here’ defending himself when he’d rather be campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire or South Carolina.”

However, as Rubin wrote, “Civil trials do not require the presence of a defendant, period.” Trump also left Wednesday’s trial after the lunch break.

“Like clockwork, the Trump campaign sent another fundraising email within the hour of Trump’s departure, accusing James of ‘inventing crimes out of thin air,’ weaponizing the justice system against Trump, and conspiring with other ‘Marxists’ to prevent his return to power,” Rubin added.

Former New York Assistant Attorney General Tristan Snell also wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter, that Trump’s attendance this week “was just a publicity stunt,” arguing similarly as Rubin that his presence offers “no legal purpose” in the case.

“He did not win any legal arguments. He embarrassed himself and got a gag order,” Snell added. “He whined in front of the cameras and begged for money from his supporters. Self-pity. Sad.”

Trump is expected to be called as a witness as the trial plays out, although his testimony is unlikely to influence the court’s decision, which has already settled on the bulk of James’ lawsuit, former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said earlier this week.

Newsweek has reached out to Trump’s press team via email for comment Wednesday night.

Putin ally suggests nuclear explosion over Russia

0

Kremlin propagandist Margarita Simonyan suggested that Russia should display its nuclear capabilities with an atomic test above its own territory.

In a video address on her Telegram channel, shared on the X (formerly Twitter) account of Russia watcher Julia Davis, the RT editor-in-chief expressed her feelings about the progress of the war in Ukraine started by her ally, Vladimir Putin.

Simonyan started the eight-minute address by describing how Russia had “celebrated the anniversary of the return of our Russian lands to us.”

On September 30, Russian authorities marked one year since Moscow claimed to have annexed the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions in Ukraine, none of which Russia fully controls.

“I am perfectly happy to live at a time when these events are taking place and historical justice is being restored,” she said, as she described how Ukrainians “are the same as you and me” and had spent “30 years in hell,” referring to the period since the breakup of the Soviet Union.

But amid her apparent joy, at the same time she said she felt “bitterness and regret” because the war started by Russia, which has killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people, was turning out to be “so long and so hard.”

While happy that Russia had seized Kherson, she lamented how it had “returned to the enemy, to the wicked stepmother,” when Ukraine eventually recaptured the city.

She said that Russian people are “praying, fighting and worrying” for Ukrainian areas like Kherson to return to Russia.

“I can’t promise you this, but if it does not, you will know no peace and neither will we,” she said. “We’ll be fighting for this peace, whatever it takes.”

She reiterated the Kremlin talking point that the war was one in which the West was fighting Russia and “trying to strangle us with Ukraine’s hands.”

Reflecting on how it will not be done as “easily and painlessly” as the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, which Kyiv is seeking to recapture, Simonyan said that “a nuclear ultimatum is becoming inevitable” because “they will not back down until they feel a lot of pain.”

She cited the call by the late Russian right-wing populist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who died in April 2022, “that we strike Washington.”

But she suggested that hitting one of Ukraine’s allies with a missile— a common refrain on the Russian state TV programs she appears on, would not be necessary.

She said that Russia could “conduct a thermonuclear explosion hundreds of kilometers above our own territory somewhere in Siberia,” and that would not impact those on the ground.

Rather than describing the intention of such a move as one to scare the West, she said its main effect would be to “destroy all radio electronics” and affect satellites, cameras and phones. Simonyan then talked about how life could revert to the time of 1993 and how “glad” she would be to live in a gadget-free world.

“The option is out there and it is the most humane one,” she concluded, leading Davis to post how Simonyan had “predicted a grim future” because she thinks “the war against Ukraine might go on for ages and suggested blowing up a nuke over Siberia to scare the West.”

NATO admits it is running out of ammunition

0

Western militaries need to increase production of ammunition to give to Ukraine because of dwindling supplies, NATO‘s most senior official has warned.

Admiral Rob Bauer, who chairs the alliance’s military committee, told a panel at the Warsaw Security Forum that members need to “ramp up production in a much higher tempo.”

While NATO members have increased military budgets as they provide support to Ukraine against Russian aggression, production capacity has not increased, he said. He described how weapons and ammunition were given to Ukraine “but not from full warehouses.”

“We started to give away from half-full or lower warehouses in Europe,” he said. “Therefore the bottom of the barrel is now visible.”

British armed forces minister James Heappey told the same panel that aid for Ukraine should continue and that “we can’t stop just because our stockpiles are looking a bit thin.”

“We have to keep Ukraine in the fight tonight and tomorrow and the day after and the day after,” he said, which meant “continuing to give while rebuilding our own stockpiles.”

Newsweek has reached out to NATO and the Ukrainian Defense Ministry for comment.

The warning comes amid concerns about how Ukraine’s allies will continue to provide Kyiv with the military support it needs to fight in the 19-month war with Russia. The U.K. has already run out of weapons equipment it can donate to Ukraine.

“We’ve given away just about as much as we can afford,” a military source told The Telegraph, insisting that the U.K. would continue to source equipment but what Kyiv needs are “air defense assets and artillery ammunition and we’ve run dry on all that.”

In the U.S, a stopgap spending bill passed by Congress to avoid a federal government shutdown did not include money to buy weapons for Ukraine.

Adding to uncertainty over American pledges of support arose on Tuesday when House Speaker Kevin McCarthy was ousted from his leadership position.

The issue of military support for Kyiv is a U.S. presidential campaign issue, with some MAGA Republicans calling for it to be curbed and questioned the oversight of the spending.

However, a report released last week by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) rejected the charges that the four spending packages passed by Congress totaling $113 billion were not being spent prudently.

“American aid to Ukraine is not only being spent properly but with significantly more oversight than any effort of its kind,” said Scott Cullinane, director of government affairs of Razom for Ukraine, a human rights group.

“Ukraine has proven that they can utilize this support efficiently and effectively as they have depleted Putin’s military capability by 50 percent,” he said in a statement emailed to Newsweek. “That is an exceptional return on investment.”

Update 10/4/23, 10:30 a.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information.