Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 85

Judge Chutkan hands Trump a loss on recusal

0

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has denied former President Donald Trump‘s motion that sought to have the judge recused from his federal election interference case in Washington, D.C., court.

Trump requested earlier this month to have Chutkan removed from his trial, claiming that the judge—who has overseen several cases involving individuals charged in connection to the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021—could not offer him a fair trial based on statements she’s made in the past.

The former president was indicted in August on four felony counts related to his purported efforts to stay in office after losing in the 2020 election to President Joe Biden. The charges stemmed from the Justice Department’s investigation into Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6 attack.

In a court filing Wednesday, Chutkan wrote that her previous statements regarding Trump or January 6 “were based on intrajudicial sources” and that the former president’s motion did not point to statements that “provide a reasonable basis to question the court’s impartiality” in Trump’s case.

“And the statements certainly do not manifest a deep-seated prejudice that would make fair judgment impossible—the standard for recusal based on statements with intrajudicial origins,” read Chutkan’s filing.

Among Chutkan’s statements that were listed in Trump’s motion include one instance in October 2022 when the judge, while reading the sentencing of January 6 rioter Christine Priola, said that the Capitol riot was the result of “a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” Trump’s defense team had argued that the meaning of Chutkan’s assertion was that the former president “is free, but should not be.”

Another statement pinpointed by Trump’s team included Chutkan’s remarks while delivering the sentencing for Robert Palmer in December 2021. Chutkan told Palmer that he had “made a very good point” during trial “that the people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged.” Trump’s team claimed that the statements “placed blame on President Trump and complained that he had not been charged.”

In Wednesday’s decision, Chutkan wrote that Priola’s sentencing was based on the defendant’s “admission that she had come to Washington, D.C. to join a protest on behalf of then-President Trump.” The judge also pointed out that in either case, she failed to mention any individual who she thought should still be charged in connection to January 6, and that Trump’s defense team were the ones who “assumed that [Trump] belongs in that undefined group.”

“In sum, the statements underlying Defendant’s Motion were based on ‘what the [court] learned from [its] participation in [each] case,'” read the decision.

Legal experts previously dismissed Trump’s motion for Chutkan’s recusal as a ridiculous move, and special counsel Jack Smith, who is leading the two federal investigations against Trump, wrote in a court filing that there was “no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan…to disqualify herself in this proceeding.”

In a statement to Newsweek Wednesday evening, a spokesperson for Trump’s campaign reiterated that Chutkan’s past statements prove that she is biased against the former president.

“Judges must not only be, in fact, impartial but must also appear to be unbiased,” read the statement. “Based on her prior statements in other cases that she already holds an opinion regarding President Trump, his legal team believes that Judge Chutkan should have recused herself. Disqualification is required whenever a reasonable person might conclude that the court is biased, such as is the situation here.”

Trump is also facing federal charges in connection to the classified documents recovered by federal officials at his Mar-a-Lago estate. In total, the former president is fighting four criminal indictments as he runs for reelection ahead of November 2024.

Update 9/27/23, 8:34 p.m. ET: This story has been updated with comment from former President Donald Trump’s campaign.

Watch: Donald Trump’s speech to autoworkers airing opposite GOP debate

0

Former President Donald Trump will be absent from the second GOP primary debate Wednesday night to instead give a speech to members of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union near Detroit, Michigan.

The former president announced his plans last week as the UAW pushes forward with its strike against the “Big Three” automakers in the United States. As of Tuesday, roughly 18,300 union members were on strike across 21 states, interrupting production at Ford, General Motors and Stellantis manufacturing sites.

Trump will be hosted by auto supplier Drake Enterprises in Clinton Township, roughly 25 miles north of Detroit. Doors were set to open at 4 p.m., reported The Detroit News, and the ex-president is expected to deliver remarks at 8 p.m.

This is the second time Trump will skip a GOP primary debate, although recent polls have found the former president nearly 40 points ahead of his closest rival, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, in the race for the next Republican presidential nomination. The rest of the GOP pack eligible for debate will meet at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library & Museum in Simi Valley, California, for a two-hour debate at 9 p.m. ET Wednesday.

Trump’s speech also arrives on the heels of President Joe Biden standing alongside striking union members on a picket line in Belleville, Michigan, an unprecedented showing of support for labor unions by a U.S. president. Biden and Trump are leading their respective parties ahead of the next presidential election, and the UAW has yet to announce its endorsement for November 2024. In 2020, the union supported Biden.

UAW President Shawn Fain slammed Trump the night before his speech, telling CNN on Tuesday that he doesn’t believe the former president “has any bit of care about what our workers stand for.” Fain also previously dismissed Trump’s plan to meet with union members, writing in a statement last week, “We can’t keep electing billionaires and millionaires.”

Watch Trump’s speech to UAW members on C-SPAN 2 or find the livestream of the event here.

Trump attacks Biden as a "wretched old vulture" in speech to autoworkers

0

Former President Donald Trump repeatedly attacked President Joe Biden during his rambling speech to autoworkers Wednesday night, including comparing the president to a “wretched old vulture.”

Trump was hosted by Drake Enterprises in Clinton Township, Michigan, to speak with workers amid the ongoing United Auto Workers (UAW) strike against the “Big Three” car manufacturers in the United States. Drake auto supplier, which is roughly 25 miles north of Detroit, is not a union plant.

During his speech, Trump targeted the Biden administration’s push toward electric vehicles (EVs) and reiterated that greener policies aimed at lowering emissions would end up destroying the automobile industry. He also claimed that Biden “is back like a wretched old vulture trying to finish off his prey.”

“I wonder if he has any idea that this stuff is happening,” Trump continued. “Biden’s job-killing EV mandate has dictated that nearly 70 percent of all cars sold in the United States must be fully electric … It’s crazy.”

The Environmental Protection Agency proposed new emissions standards back in May that would require 67.5 percent of all car sales in the U.S. to be electric by 2032. The White House has not adopted any official standards.

“Biden’s mandate isn’t a government regulation, it’s a government assassination of your jobs and of your industry,” Trump told autoworkers Wednesday.

Trump has repeatedly called for the UAW’s endorsement ahead of the 2024 election, arguing that Biden’s policies could cause the automobile industry to go out of business. UAW President Shawn Fain, however, previously praised the president’s steps toward greener energy.

During Wednesday’s speech, Trump also claimed that Biden’s “entire career has been an act of economic treason” against labor unions, and again urged for the UAW’s support.

“Rotten and crooked politicians like Biden treat American jobs as disposable and American workers as expendable,” Trump told supporters. “They sat back and got rich by taking bribes to let other countries rape and pillage our jobs.”

Trump appears to be referring to the allegations by House Republicans that Biden accepted bribes while serving as vice president, one of several accusations at the heart of the GOP’s call for an impeachment inquiry into the president. The accusations, such as those made by former Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Shokin, were previously found to be “not supported by facts” by the Justice Department under the Trump administration.

The event on Wednesday arrived one day after Biden met with UAW members on strike in Michigan, the first time that a sitting president in modern U.S. history stood with union members on a picket line. Prior to Trump’s rally, Fain said that he found “pathetic irony” in the former president attempting to show support for the UAW.

Newsweek has reached out to the UAW via email Wednesday night for comment.

Update 09/27/23, 10:13 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information and background.

Russia vows to return all children "rescued" from Ukraine upon request

0

Russia’s ambassador to the United States has told Newsweek that his government is prepared to act upon any request to facilitate the return of Ukrainian children brought to Russia amid the ongoing conflict between the two nations.

Around 700,000 Ukrainian children have been evacuated to Russian territory since the war began in February 2022. The governments of Ukraine and its top supporter, the United States, have alleged that such transfers amounted to a mass abduction, serving as the basis for an arrest warrant issued against Russian President Vladimir Putin by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in March of this year.

But after Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov faced a barrage of questions on the subject at a press conference Sunday during the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Ambassador Anatoly Antonov criticized what he referred to as a Western media “perception” on the matter that “seems shaped more by propaganda spread by unscrupulous politicians in Kiev and Washington than by facts.”

“We have nothing to hide in this regard,” Antonov told Newsweek. “We are open and prepared for a constructive dialogue on this pressing issue.”

“We stand ready to provide the names of all minors currently on Russian territory for their own safety,” Antonov said. “We maintain a comprehensive list of these children. Any child for whom we receive requests from their legal representatives—parents or guardians—will be promptly reunited with their families. We haven’t kidnapped anyone; quite the opposite, we have rescued these children.”

The Russian envoy pointed specifically to discussions held by Russian authorities, including Putin’s special representative for children’s rights Maria Lvova-Belova and the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations for Children and Armed Conflict Virginia Gamba during the latter’s visit to Moscow in May.

Newsweek has reached out to the Office of the Special Representative of the U.N. Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflicts, the Office of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian Embassy to the United States, the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ukrainian Ministry for Social Policy’s Department of Children’s Rights and Health Improvement for comment.

Days before Lavrov’s press conference, Zelensky made reference to the issue during his address to the U.N. General Assembly. Speaking to international heads of state and officials, the Ukrainian leader said Tuesday his administration was aware of “the names of tens of thousands of children and have evidence on hundreds of thousands of others kidnapped by Russia in the occupied territories of Ukraine and later deported.”

“We are trying to get children back home, but time goes by,” Zelensky said at the time. “What will happen to them? Those children in Russia are taught to hate Ukraine, and all ties with their families are broken… This is clearly a genocide.”

But Antonov saw such allegations as part of a growing trend in which he felt Moscow had been blamed without sufficient evidence for atrocities and incidents such as the Bucha massacre near Kyiv in March of last year and the explosive sabotage of the Nord Steam 2 pipeline in the waters of the Baltic Sea last September.

Ukrainian and U.S. officials have accused Russian troops of killing more than 450 people and committing other atrocities such as rape and torture in Bucha, while Antonov attested to “Russia having clear evidence that it was entirely staged.”

The Nord Stream pipeline bombings also initially sparked Western speculation as to potential Russian involvement, but no official consensus has been reached by investigating agencies. Citing intelligence reviewed by unnamed U.S. officials, The New York Times reported in March that evidence suggested it was a pro-Ukrainian group behind the attack, though the Zelensky administration has denied any such connection.

Antonov cited a more recent article by The New York Times that pointed to a Ukrainian missile being the most likely munition that caused the deaths of at least 15 people and wounded 30 others earlier this month at a market in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kostiantynivka. Ukrainian and U.S. authorities claimed that Russia was behind the attack.

“The publication of such articles gives us hope that not all is lost, and that U.S. media still uphold journalistic ethics,” Antonov said. “Professional correspondents, of whom there are many in the United States, seem to have the desire to delve deeper into various issues.”

Antonov said he hoped such reporting “will inspire further investigations into the Ukrainian staging in Bucha, as well as the terrorist attacks on the Nord Stream pipelines, and will clear thing up with the West’s narrative surrounding alleged poisonings of the Skripals and Navalny, purportedly orchestrated by Russia.”

Sergei Skripal, a former Russian military officer who had secretly served as a double agent for British intelligence, and his daughter, Yulia, were targeted by an apparent assassination attempt using a nerve agent in Salisbury, England in March 2018. Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny was also allegedly poisoned during a flight from Tomsk to Moscow in August 2020.

In both cases, as well as in a number of others that have befallen outspoken critics of the Kremlin, sometimes to deadlier effect, the U.S. has alleged that the Russian government had a hand in the apparent poisonings and other forms of assassination plots, a charge vehemently denied by Moscow.

Speaking to the Western skepticism surrounding Russia’s narrative on such events, Antonov stated that “it is evident how challenging it is for veracious information—including for the materials provided by the Embassy—to reach the readers.” He argued that “any insights from Russian official sources are promptly branded as Kremlin propaganda.”

“The truth faces an exceedingly thorny path in reaching the U.S. audience,” Antonov said. “Nevertheless, the American public is prepared and even eager for an unbiased analysis of the facts. We have much to share, and rest assured, there are professionals who are both knowledgeable and passionate about their work.”

“The lack of such articles in the local information landscape is starkly evident,” he added. “We are ready to contribute to changing this situation for the better.”

Could "Trump Org II" be used to escape fraud ruling? What we know

0

An alleged attempt by Donald Trump to escape penalties in a $250 million fraud lawsuit involving his real estate company may already have been foiled by New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office.

Judge Arthur Engoron on Tuesday resolved one of the main claims made in James’ suit against the former president and ruled that Trump provided false and misleading financial statements, inflating the value of several of his properties for years in order to achieve financial perks and better bank loans.

The decision is a huge victory for James and means that the upcoming civil trial involving Trump, his real estate company and sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., due to begin on October 2, will not need to determine whether the Trump family and the real estate company gave fraudulent statements overvaluing his properties by billions of dollars for years and will only decide on the penalty handed out.

Trump said he will appeal the ruling, and accused the “widespread, radical attack” against him of having “devolved to new, un-American depths.”

In October 2022, James’ office said that Trump’s company set up a new entity that could have been an attempt to offload assets before the case went to trial.

The entity, called the Trump Organization II, was registered in New York state on September 21, 2022, the same day that James announced her $250 million lawsuit against the former president and his company.

James’ office called for measures to be implemented to ensure that the original Trump Organization does not move assets out of New York into the Delaware company or anywhere else without court approval.

“Since we filed this sweeping lawsuit last month, Donald Trump and the Trump Organization have continued those same fraudulent practices and taken measures to evade responsibility,” James said.

Trump attorney Alina Habba said at the time that the real estate company had “repeatedly provided assurance” that the Trump Organization has “no intention of doing anything improper.”

In November 2022, Engoron agreed to James’ request that an independent monitor be brought in to oversee the transactions of the Trump Organization after the Delaware-based entity was set up.

In his ruling, Engoron said that Trump and the Trump Organization “demonstrated propensity to engage in persistent fraud” and that appointing an outside monitor “is the most prudent and narrowly tailored mechanism to ensure there is no further fraud or illegality” is committed while James’ lawsuit is pending.

The alleged attempt by the Trump Organization to dodge potential penalties from James’ lawsuit was noted by legal analyst and former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance after Engoron’s Tuesday ruling.

“Trump created a Delaware business entity a year ago in an effort to avoid the consequences of the corporate death penalty a NY judge imposed on his business entities today,” Vance posted on X, formerly Twitter.

The Trump Organization has been contacted via email for comment.

In his 35-page ruling, Engoron said that Trump’s inflated assessment of his properties, including his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, golf courses and his triplex apartment at Trump Tower in New York, came from a “fantasy world, not a real world.”

In a statement after the decision, Trump called Engoron deranged and accused him of doing the bidding of the completely biased and corrupt New York attorney general.

“We are rapidly becoming a communist country, and my civil rights have been taken away from me,” Trump added. “This is Democrat political lawfare and a witch hunt at a level never seen before.”

Donald Trump’s "worst nightmare"

0

Donald Trump could be hit where it hurts him the most as he faces a potentially major financial penalty and his businesses taken from him under New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $250 million lawsuit, a legal expert told Newsweek.

Andrew Lieb, a real estate attorney and legal political analyst, was reacting to the ruling from Judge Arthur Engoron that the former president had misled banks and insurers by inflating the value of his properties in financial statements for years in order to obtain financial perks.

Engoron also ruled that the New York business certificates of The Trump Organization will be canceled, as well as any certificates of companies owned by Trump and two of his sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr.—who are also named in James’ suit—which may result in the former president’s companies being removed from his control and dissolved.

Trump said he will appeal the ruling, and accused the “widespread, radical attack” against him of having “devolved to new, un-American depths.”

The ruling from Engoron is a major victory for James and means that the issue of whether Trump committed fraud while valuing numerous properties will not need to be decided in the civil trial when it begins on October 2 and will now mainly determine the size and scale of the penalty.

While James’ lawsuit is asking for a fine of up to $250 million for fraud, as well as a ban on Trump running businesses in New York, the true figure will be decided by Engoron. Michael Cohen, a former Trump lawyer whose 2019 congressional testimony triggered the investigation that resulted in James’ $250 million suit, told CNN on Tuesday he estimates that the judge could fine Trump as much as $600 million when taking into account interest and penalty.

Lieb has suggested that beyond “going to jail for the rest of his life” in any of the criminal cases Trump faces, punishing the former president financially and having his business certificates canceled will cause him the greatest pain.

“This is the next worst nightmare that Donald Trump must have been having each night as he slept in his club, Mar-a-Lago, which is one of the many properties that the Judge found Trump drastically overvalued by ignoring zoning restrictions when seeking loans,” Lieb told Newsweek.

“To make matters worse, there is still a trial happening on six other causes of action that were also levied by the attorney general in this case against Trump where he can still be ordered to pay $250 million plus after the trial.”

Trump is alleged to have drastically overvalued his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump valued the resort between 2011 to 2021 at $347 million to $739 million based on the premise that it was unrestricted property and could be developed for residential use.

Engoron noted that Trump’s assessment was at least 2,300 percent above a Palm Beach County Assessor’s appraisal from the same period, which estimated Mar-a-Lago’s value to be between $18 million and $27.6 million as it is listed as a social club and cannot be sold as a single-family estate.

In his 35-page ruling, Engoron said that Trump’s inflated assessment of his properties, which also include golf courses, his Seven Springs Estate in New York state and his triplex apartment at Trump Tower in Manhattan, came from a “fantasy world, not a real world.”

Engoron’s decision is also the latest in a series of legal headaches that the former president is facing amid his latest presidential campaign. The 91 criminal charges filed against Trump across for criminal cases—which Trump has denied— are not harming the former president in the 2024 GOP presidential primary polls and he remains the overwhelming favorite to clinch the Republican nomination.

However, Lieb suggested the fallout from James’ $250 million lawsuit may damage Trump in the eyes of potential key independent and moderate Republican voters, whose support the former president may have to rely on if he has any hopes of winning the general election next year.

“This won’t damage Trump in his MAGA political circles that he needs for the nomination, but amongst independents and traditional Republicans, it’s yet another reminder that he is a failed businessman whose iconic Trump Tower will soon fade into our memories as his assets are liquidated by an independent receiver,” Lieb told Newsweek.

In a statement after Engoron’s ruling, Trump called the judge “deranged” and accused him of “doing the bidding” of the “completely biased and corrupt” New York Attorney General.

“We are rapidly becoming a communist country, and my civil rights have been taken away from me,” Trump said. “This is Democrat political lawfare and a witch hunt at a level never seen before.”

18 signs it’s time for your business to raise prices

0

Maintaining the delicate balance between profit and customer satisfaction is a constant challenge. These days, business owners find themselves in the tough position of needing to raise prices to maintain their business in a world plagued by inflation. In a competitive market, price changes can be a double-edged sword, potentially boosting revenues or driving customers away.

To navigate this landscape successfully, it’s crucial for businesses to identify signs that indicate it might be time to raise prices. Below, 18 Newsweek Expert Forum members share the intricacies of pricing strategy and explore the key factors that signal when your business should consider this significant step.

1. Inflation, Insurance and Interest Rates Spike

We serve the regulated public utilities industry. Annually, we research salary, labor and equipment markets to update rates. The biggest signals include inflation, insurance premiums and interest rates, which affect borrowing money and growth. Emergency response, when we do wildfire mitigation, affects regional pricing. Global networking helps us measure the pulse of what’s happening. – Nooshin Behroyan, Paxon Energy & Infrustructure

2. Production or Operation Costs Increase

One sign that it’s time for a business to consider raising prices is when the costs of production or operation significantly increases. This impacts profitability and makes maintaining current prices unsustainable. – Alan Wozniak, Business Health Matters (BHM) Executive Consulting

3. Your Goods or Services Are in High Demand

We’ve all heard the age-old saying, “You have to strike when the iron is hot.” For me, this means following the trends. Chances are if the economy is thriving and people are discreetly spending money in your industry, you should not be afraid to test the waters and increase the costs of your services. This is especially the case when your service is in high demand. If need be, you can always make adjustments later. – Tammy McCrory, McCrory Center: Behavioral Health

4. Similar Businesses Are Raising Prices

One sign is when similar businesses are raising prices around you. It’s important to always be analyzing the business environment and stay up to date on changes within your industry so quick decisions in pricing can be made. – Christian Anderson, Lost Boy Entertainment LLC

5. Your Business is Meeting Sales Targets with Ease

If the business is consistently meeting its sales targets with ease, it may be a sign to raise prices. This could mean your goods or services are priced below the market’s willingness to pay. Therefore, raising prices might be a feasible strategy, allowing the business to maximize revenue without sacrificing sales volume as long as it stays within what the market can bear. – Joseph Soares, IBPROM Corp.

6. Your Offering Has a High Market Value

In general, your price should be reflective of the value perceived by the market for your goods or services in comparison to the competition. Rampant inflation needs to be tamed, and jumping on the bandwagon to raise prices without merit will deteriorate your brand reputation in the long run. I am genuinely grateful to those that offer a quality product at a fair price. – Margie Kiesel

7. You Consistently See Positive Feedback

Navigating pricing is a fine line. In our journey, after enhancing our offerings and seeing consistent positive feedback on the added value, we contemplated price adjustments. It’s crucial to ensure prices genuinely reflect the value without crossing into profiteering. – Ian Wilding, Hangar 75

8. Your Team Members are Burnt Out

One thing you need to consider is the burden of work on your team. If your team members are getting easily burned out with the amount of work that needs to be done to provide goods and services, it’s time to raise the value and prices and put dedicated time and effort into hiring. – Ryan Carroll, Wealth Assistants

9. Your Offering Has Added Value After Improvements

It is time to raise your prices when you have improved the features, quality or overall value of your product or service. It’s important to tie the perceived value of your offering to current market norms, ensuring that your pricing structure is competitive. The key to shaping this perceived value lies in effective communication. – Gergo Vari, Lensa

10. Your Business is Not Profitable

If you’re experiencing a lack of profit after deducting expenses, it may be time to consider increasing product or service prices. It’s important to factor in overhead, productivity and employee wages and then analyze your ROI and KPIs to assess your net income. – Tammy Sons, Tn Nursery

11. People Have More Liquidity and Disposable Income

One sign it’s time to raise prices is when you always need to think about the liquidity in the economy and people’s disposable income. Right now, interest rates are high and many people are living in debt. In this environment, people are price conscious and preferences may shift down the market if you incorrectly price your product. In most cases, wait for signs of more liquidity and higher disposable incomes before raising prices. – Zain Jaffer, Zain Ventures

12. Your Inventory Rapidly and Repeatedly Depletes

The need to raise prices on goods and services could be the result of inflation, increased operating expenses, competitor pricing, market conditions, supply and demand and more. One sign that it may be time to raise prices on particular items is when inventory is repeatedly and rapidly depleted. To determine new price points, run market tests on a subset of customers before rolling out new prices. – Lillian Gregory, The 4D Unicorn LLC

13. Customers Are Willing to Pay More

One sign is customers being willing to pay more for your product or service. This means the value your offering provides exceeds the current price. – James Fox, EVBox

14. Your Costs Are Greater Than Your Profits

A business should raise prices if it begins to make less than 45 percent of its total product cost in profit. The typical business formula is that 25 percent should be on materials, 15 percent should be on payroll and 10 percent should go to surrounding costs like insurance, rent, phones and equipment. The total product costs should be 50 percent with the remaining 50 percent as profit. – Baruch Labunski, Rank Secure

15. Market Research and Feedback Are Favorable

Businesses need to consider how a price increase might impact customer loyalty and sales volume. Market research and direct customer feedback can help determine potential price changes. – Britton Bloch, Navy Federal

16. You Are Overwhelmed With Leads

It is time to clean up the pipeline when we are getting overwhelmed by the number of incoming leads and we can’t service our clients on the same level as before. For us, raising prices is equal to providing better quality service. – Krisztina Veres, Veres Career Consulting

17. Your Customers Are Emotionally Invested

Consider conducting an emotional value analysis, which is an endeavor that focuses on understanding customer responses and connections to a product or service. If acquired data denotes increasing emotional investment without a corresponding price change, then this is a sign of untapped value. By conducting this evaluation of demand, businesses can make price adjustments. – Dr. Kira Graves, Kira Graves Consulting

18. You Spend Little Time Negotiating Prices With Clients

When you spend little to no time negotiating prices, terms and conditions with current or prospective clients, it’s time to revisit your price and profitability models. And when market conditions shift—or you are operating at or past capacity—it’s time to revisit and raise prices as well. – Karen Mangia, The Engineered Innovation Group

The Newsweek Expert Forum is an invitation-only network of influential leaders, experts, executives, and entrepreneurs who share their insights with our audience.What’s this?Content labeled as the Expert Forum is produced and managed by Newsweek Expert Forum, a fee based, invitation only membership community. The opinions expressed in this content do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Newsweek or the Newsweek Expert Forum.

Did Trump get "corporate death penalty" in New York? What we know

0

A New York judge has issued a punishing blow to former President Donald Trump‘s business empire, potentially delivering what some are calling the “corporate death penalty.”

Judge Arthur Engoron on Tuesday ruled Trump liable for fraud while partially granting New York Attorney General Letitia James’ motion for a summary judgment in her $250 million lawsuit against the former president. Trump’s motion for a summary dismissal was denied, while members of his legal team were hit with sanctions.

Engoron also ordered the cancellation of business licenses for The Trump Organization and several other New York entities associated with the ex-president, effectively crippling or ending their ability to operate in the state. The judge went on to order that the parties recommend independent receivers to oversee the dissolution of the businesses.

The order concerning dissolution was referred to as the “corporate death penalty” by several legal experts on social media, including former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance, former Defense Department Special Counsel Ryan Goodman and former Trump impeachment counsel Norm Eisen.

The language in Engoron’s ruling is somewhat ambiguous as it does not explicitly order that Trump’s businesses be dissolved—instead calling for the naming of receivers who would oversee any dissolution.

“Taken on its face, the plain meaning of the conclusions at the end of this 35-page order by Judge Engoron is that he seems to be ordering the dissolution of The Trump Organization,” former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner said during an MSNBC appearance shortly after the ruling was handed down.

In addition to Trump and his businesses, Tuesday’s ruling also applies to the former president’s adult sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as well as former Trump Organization executives Allen Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney.

Engoron further ruled that retired Judge Barbara Jones would oversee the finances of The Trump Organization, pending any further rulings.

The judge did not rule on all aspects of James’ suit, which accuses the former president and his co-defendants of misrepresenting business assets to obtain favorable loans and tax benefits. The trial is set to begin October 2, although lawyers for Trump have asked for a delay.

Newsweek reached out for comment to the Trump Organization via email on Tuesday.

Trump lawyer Alina Habba vowed that the former president would appeal what she called a “flawed” ruling in a statement emailed to Newsweek on Tuesday night.

“Today’s decision is fundamentally flawed at every level,” Habba said. “It is important to remember that the Trump Organization is an American success story. The fact that this Court summarily found that there is no question of fact, finding in part that Mar-a-Lago is worth approximately $20 million and issue a decision of this magnitude is an affront to our legal system.”

“We intend to immediately appeal this decision because President Trump and his family, like every American business owner, is entitled to their day in court,” she added.

If Trump’s companies are forced to dissolve, the ex-president’s business empire would not necessarily cease to exist entirely. Engoron’s decisions only apply to Trump’s named businesses in New York, leaving room for the possibility that operations for the impacted companies could be moved to other states.

Trump fumes at "un-American" court ruling that finds he committed fraud

0

Former President Donald Trump claimed that a New York judge is “deranged,” while denouncing an “un-American” court ruling that deemed he committed fraud.

Judge Arthur Engoron on Tuesday ruled that Trump, his adult sons, The Trump Organization and several other New York business entities associated with the ex-president were civilly liable for fraud in a decision that partially granted New York Attorney General Letitia James’ motion for a summary judgment.

James filed a $250 million lawsuit against Trump last year, accusing the former president of illegally misrepresenting his business assets for financial benefit. Engoron’s ruling did not decide all aspects of the case, which is set to go to trial next week, pending a request for a delay from Trump’s lawyers.

Trump, the leading candidate for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, claimed that Engoron was “doing the bidding” of James in a furious statement posted to Truth Social on Tuesday.

“The widespread, radical attack against me, my family, and my supporters has now devolved to new, un-American depths, at the hands of a DERANGED New York State Judge, doing the bidding of a completely biased and corrupt ‘Prosecutor,’ Letitia James,” Trump wrote.

“We are rapidly becoming a Communist Country, and my Civil Rights have been taken away from me,” he continued. “A Highly Politicized Democrat Judge … simply rule[d], despite all of the evidence to the contrary, that I committed fraud, which is both ridiculous and untrue.”

Newsweek reached out for comment to the office of James via email on Tuesday night.

The former president, who has separately pleaded not guilty to 91 felony criminal charges this year, went on to claim without evidence that Engoron’s decision was part of a “witch hunt” orchestrated by Democrats.

“This is Democrat Political Lawfare, and a Witch Hunt at a level never seen before,” wrote Trump. “It is an attempt to badly injure the opposing Party’s Leading, by far, Political Candidate. Nothing like this has ever happened in our Country before.”

“My Civil Rights have been violated, and some Appellate Court, whether Federal or State, must reverse this horrible, un-American decision,” he added. “If they can do this to me, they can do this to YOU!”

While partially granting James’ motion for a summary judgement on Tuesday, Engoron rejected Trump’s motion for the case to be summarily dismissed, while ordering members of his legal team to pay sanctions for pushing “indefensible” arguments in the motion.

The ruling also ordered The Trump Organization and several other New York business entities associated with the ex-president to be stripped of their licenses and potentially face dissolution, a move that some experts have called the “corporate death penalty.”

Trump filed his own lawsuit against Engoron earlier this month, which is expected to be ruled on by an appeals court by Thursday. Trump urged the “highest courts” to take control of the case in a Truth Social post on Monday, arguing that he had been “unfairly sued” by James.

Trump slammed by UAW president ahead of rally near Detroit

0

United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain said that he finds “pathetic irony” in former President Donald Trump‘s plan to hold a rally for union workers on Wednesday as the UAW continues its strike against America’s “Big Three” automakers.

The UAW, which represents nearly 150,000 autoworkers nationwide, went on strike this month against Ford, General Motors and Stellantis over demands for higher wages and increased benefits. The walkout began targeted locations on September 15, but has since expanded to included 18,300 workers spread across 21 states.

Trump made plans last week to meet with UAW members at Drake Enterprises—an auto supplier north of Detroit—marking the second time the former president will miss a GOP primary debate as he vies for the next Republican presidential nomination. But Fain, speaking with CNN‘s Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday, dismissed Trump’s rally efforts, noting that the plant hosting the former president is a non-union manufacturer.

“I find the pathetic irony that the former president is going to hold a rally for union members at a non-union business,” Fain said during his appearance on CNN’s The Situation Room. “And you know, all you have to do is look at his track record. His track record speaks for itself.”

“In 2008 during the Great Recession, [Trump] blamed UAW members, he blamed our contracts for everything that was wrong with these companies,” Fain continued. “That’s a complete lie.”

Fain also cited Trump’s comments while running for office in 2016, when the former president suggested during an interview with The Detroit News that automakers should move some production plants out of Michigan into lower-wage states to avoid having to expand production into Mexico. Trump added during the interview that automakers could then make a “full-circle” move, “you’ll come back to Michigan because those guys are going to want their jobs back even if it is less.”

“The ultimate show of how much he cares about our workers was in 2019 when he was the president of the United States,” Fain said Tuesday. “Where was he then?”

“Our workers at [General Motors] were on strike for 60 days,” he added. “For two months, they were out there on the picket lines. I didn’t see him hold a rally. I didn’t see him stand up at the picket line.”

When asked by Blitzer if he intends to meet with Trump when he makes a visit to Michigan on Wednesday, Fain responded, “I see no point in meeting with him.”

“Because I don’t think he has any bit of care about what our workers stand for, what the working class stands for,” Fain concluded. “He serves a billionaire class, and that’s what’s wrong with this country.”

The CNN interview occurred a few hours after President Joe Biden joined union members on strike in Michigan, likely becoming the first U.S. president in history to join a picket line while serving in office, according to presidency scholars. Fain had challenged Biden to stand beside union members last week after announcing that the strike was expanding.

“The middle class built this country. And unions built the middle class,” Biden told picketers on Tuesday, according to a report from The New York Times. “That’s a fact. Let’s keep going. You deserve what you’ve earned, and you’ve earned a hell of a lot more than you get paid now.”

The UAW has yet to give its endorsement for the 2024 presidential election, and Fain told Blitzer that his criticisms of Trump were not an indication that Biden was the union’s choice for November of next year.

Newsweek emailed Trump’s campaign team for comment Tuesday night.